streamlabs_get_source
Retrieve detailed information for a specific Streamlabs source by providing its source ID.
Instructions
Get details for a single source by id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sourceId | Yes |
Retrieve detailed information for a specific Streamlabs source by providing its source ID.
Get details for a single source by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sourceId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does not disclose what happens for invalid IDs, what 'details' includes, or any error behavior. The read-only nature is implied by 'Get' but not explicitly stated.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, front-loaded sentence with no fluff. Every word contributes to the purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-parameter read tool, the description is minimal but reasonably adequate. However, without an output schema or annotations, it would benefit from explaining what 'details' are returned and any side effects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must clarify the param. 'by id' adds meaning that sourceId is an identifier, differentiating it from name-based tools, but does not elaborate on format, provenance, or how to obtain the ID.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get details') and the resource ('a single source by id'). It distinguishes from siblings like streamlabs_list_sources and streamlabs_get_sources_by_name by specifying the id-based lookup.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like streamlabs_get_source_settings or streamlabs_get_sources_by_name. The description implies use when you have a sourceId, but does not offer exclusions or comparisons.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AhmadTariq1337/streamlabs-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server