streamlabs_enable_studio_mode

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It explains what the tool does ('Enable studio mode') and adds context about what studio mode entails ('preview + program view'), but it does not disclose potential side effects, prerequisites, or reversibility. For a simple state-change action, this is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that immediately states the action ('Enable studio mode') followed by a brief clarifying parenthetical. There is no filler or redundant detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity (no parameters, no output schema), the description is sufficient to inform an agent about the action and its purpose. It lacks mention of related sibling tools, but that is not necessary for a simple enable action.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and schema coverage is 100% vacuously, so the baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter-specific information because there are no parameters to describe.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function with a specific verb 'Enable' and a specific resource 'studio mode', further clarified as 'preview + program view for previewing scenes before they go live'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like disable_studio_mode and get_studio_mode_status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context by explaining the purpose ('for previewing scenes before they go live'), which implies when to use it. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives or exclusions, such as using disable_studio_mode to turn it off or get_studio_mode_status to check current state.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.