pages_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Get detailed info' without specifying what fields are returned, whether authentication is required, or if this is a safe read-only operation. The lack of any behavioral detail is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no fluff, well front-loaded. However, it is perhaps too terse, missing valuable context that could be added without excessive length. Still, it earns high marks for efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no additional context, the description leaves the user guessing about the return format and content. For a simple get operation it is marginally adequate, but completeness is low given the absence of behavioral or return-value details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It does not explain the page_id parameter beyond its name, leaving the format, source, or any constraints undocumented. The param name is self-explanatory but the description adds no value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the purpose as retrieving detailed information about a Page, with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like pages_get_post and pages_get_insights, though 'detailed info' is somewhat generic.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives. It does not mention that this is for page metadata, nor does it reference sibling tools like pages_list or pages_get_post for other scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.