ena-biosamples-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ena-biosamples-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying and retrieving bacterial and viral genomic data, features, antimicrobial resistance, and epitopes from the BV-BRC API using natural language.MIT

@pipeworx/enaofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching ENA's public sequencing data by organism, study, platform, country or date, retrieving FASTQ/BAM download URLs and checksums, and discovering available result types and fields.185 npmMIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for querying BV-BRC biological data, submitting analysis jobs (assembly, annotation, BLAST, etc.), and managing workspace files via natural language.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for querying the EBI PRIDE Archive, a proteomics (mass-spectrometry) data repository, through natural language or direct tool calls.181 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving cancer-genomics projects, cases, and genomic data files — including TCGA, TARGET, and CPTAC — via keyless, open-access metadata tools. Supports filtering by primary site, project, or data category, and can route plain-English questions to the right tool automatically.317 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables natural language querying of a customer and orders database through read-only MCP tools for finding customers, listing orders, and generating revenue summaries.-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
count_records and search_samples overlap on the species+samples axis, since search_samples already returns a total count alongside records, which could cause hesitation about which to call for a simple sample tally. Otherwise the retrieval (get_biosample) and validation (check_sample_metadata) tools are clearly distinct despite sharing an accession argument.
All four tools follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (count_records, search_samples, get_biosample, check_sample_metadata) with consistent, predictable verb semantics.
Four tools is on the lean side but coherent for a focused ENA/BioSamples lookup server, covering count, search, fetch, and validate without redundancy. It could arguably support one more retrieval tool, but nothing feels bloated.
The search→get→validate lifecycle for BioSamples is well covered and closure is sensible. Minor gaps: count_records tallies read_run and assembly records but there is no way to retrieve those records, and search_samples only filters by country.