saas_api_pause_location

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare non-read-only and non-destructive behaviors. The description adds the crucial auth context (agency-level token, not a location PIT), which is not in the annotations. However, it does not disclose side effects or reversibility, so it only partially augments the structured data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence that front-loads the action and places the key requirement in a parenthetical. No unnecessary words; every element earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the action and auth requirement, and the schema handles parameter documentation. Missing are explicit guidance on sibling selection and expected outcome, which makes it adequate but not fully complete for a mutation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% coverage, so all parameters are documented. The tool description adds no parameter-level details, relying entirely on the schema. This meets the baseline for full schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear action (pause) and resource (location), making the purpose unambiguous. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like saas_api_enable_saas_location or the deprecated saas_api_pause_location_deprecated, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes an authentication requirement (agency-level token) but gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as the enable or deprecated pause tools. There are no explicit exclusions or scenario-based recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.