Yandex Audience MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Yandex Audience MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Yandex Metrica analytics: query web analytics metrics, goals, conversions, and raw API data using natural language from AI clients like Claude and Cursor.896 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Yandex Metrika API, enabling reporting, counter management, goals, filters, and other operations via natural language.122MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Yandex Merchants API enabling management of product offers (prices, discounts, hide/show) via natural language from AI assistants like Claude and Cursor.1389 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that enables natural-language interaction with the Avito Ads advertising API, including campaign, ad group, and creative management, statistics retrieval, fund transfers, and ORD paperwork filing.26200 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents direct access to the Yandex Direct API to manage campaigns, groups, ads, keywords, bids, and reports via natural language.117 npm6Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with Yandex Cloud AI Studio, enabling chat, text generation, image generation, speech recognition/synthesis, embeddings, classification, search indexes, and AI agent creation with function calling.-
TDQS
Scored across 20 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: pixels, segments, segment grants, authentication, and raw API access are cleanly separated. Even the two upload tools are clearly differentiated by file format (TSV/TXT versus CSV CRM) and by the confirm_segment follow-up step.
Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern: create_pixel, delete_segment, list_segments, add_segment_grant. Minor exceptions like auth_status, logout, and raw_request break the pattern slightly, but they are still readable and predictable in context.
Twenty tools is on the higher end, but the count is justified by the breadth of the Yandex Audience API: pixels, segments, grants, auth lifecycle, and an escape hatch. There is little redundancy and each tool appears to earn its place, so it feels slightly broad rather than bloated.
The tool set covers the full lifecycle for pixels, segments, and grants, plus authentication and a raw_request fallback for rarely used API operations. There are no obvious dead ends: file uploads have a confirm step, lookalike and pixel segments have creation paths, and missing operations like reprocess or undelete are accessible through raw_request.