Qlik MCP Server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the tool supports filtering, sorting, and pagination, and describes the return format ('Array of automation objects with id, name, description, enabled status, etc.'). However, it lacks details on permissions needed, rate limits, error handling, or whether it's a read-only operation (though implied by 'List').

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is appropriately sized and front-loaded: the first sentence states the core purpose, followed by organized bullet points for features and returns. Every sentence earns its place with no redundant or verbose content, making it easy to scan and understand.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (a list operation with filtering/sorting/pagination), no annotations, and no output schema, the description is fairly complete: it explains the purpose, parameters, and return format. However, it could improve by detailing behavioral aspects like authentication needs or pagination mechanics, but it adequately covers the essentials for a list tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all three parameters (filter, sort, limit) with descriptions and examples. The description adds minimal value by restating the same information in bullet points without providing additional context or semantics beyond what the schema offers.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific verb ('List') and resource ('all automations that the user has access to'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like qlik_automation_get_details (which gets details of a specific automation) and qlik_automation_list_runs (which lists runs rather than automations). It precisely defines the scope of what is being listed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context by specifying 'all automations that the user has access to,' which suggests it's for browsing or filtering automations. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like qlik_automation_get_details for specific details or qlik_automation_list_runs for runs, nor does it mention any exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.