Qlik MCP Server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions that the tool 'queues a new run' and requires the automation to be enabled, which adds some behavioral context. However, it lacks details on permissions needed, rate limits, whether the run is synchronous/asynchronous, or error handling for disabled automations, leaving significant gaps for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with clear sections (Parameters, Returns, Note), front-loaded with the core action, and every sentence adds value without redundancy. It's appropriately sized for a single-parameter tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description covers the basic action and prerequisite but lacks details on return values (only mentions 'Run details' vaguely), error cases, or integration with sibling tools. It's minimally adequate but has clear gaps given the complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with the schema documenting 'automationId' as 'The automation ID to run'. The description adds minimal value by restating this as 'The automation to execute' without providing additional semantics like format examples or constraints beyond what the schema already covers.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'execute' and resource 'automation' with the action 'queue a new run', making the purpose specific. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'qlik_automation_list_runs' or 'qlik_trigger_app_reload', which might involve related automation concepts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The note 'The automation must be enabled before it can be run' provides implied guidance on prerequisites, but it doesn't explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., compared to 'qlik_automation_list_runs' for checking runs or 'qlik_trigger_app_reload' for other automation types). No exclusions or clear alternatives are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.