# MCP Development Analysis and Recommendations
*Comprehensive analysis of GitHub Events project and mcp-prompts project*
*Date: August 20, 2025*
*Author: AI Assistant Analysis*
---
## Executive Summary
After comprehensive analysis of both the **GitHub Events monitoring project** (`gh_events`) and the **mcp-prompts project**, along with research into MCP server development best practices, this document provides strategic recommendations for repository restructuring, Docker containerization improvements, and development workflow optimization.
### Key Findings
1. **GitHub Events Project**: Well-structured Python/FastAPI project with proper Docker containerization, but lacks MCP server implementation despite having MCP endpoints
2. **MCP-Prompts Project**: Sophisticated TypeScript monorepo with hexagonal architecture, existing Docker infrastructure, but shows signs of over-engineering complexity ("prompt rot")
3. **Docker Infrastructure**: Both projects need unified Docker development practices and consistent containerization standards
4. **Architecture Evolution**: Evidence of architectural complexity growth requiring consolidation and simplification
---
## Current State Analysis
### GitHub Events Monitor (`gh_events`)
**Strengths:**
- ✅ Clean Python architecture with FastAPI
- ✅ Proper Docker containerization with health checks
- ✅ Database abstraction with async SQLite
- ✅ Comprehensive API documentation
- ✅ Background task management
- ✅ Environment-based configuration
- ✅ Visualization capabilities (matplotlib integration)
**Gaps:**
- ❌ Missing actual MCP server implementation (only has HTTP endpoints)
- ❌ No MCP TypeScript SDK integration
- ❌ Limited to single-container deployment
- ❌ No multi-architecture Docker builds
- ❌ Missing development Docker Compose setup
**Technical Debt:**
```python
# Current: HTTP-only "MCP" endpoints
@app.get("/mcp/capabilities")
async def get_mcp_capabilities():
# Returns JSON but no actual MCP protocol
```
### MCP-Prompts Project
**Strengths:**
- ✅ Hexagonal architecture with clean separation of concerns
- ✅ Comprehensive TypeScript implementation with proper types
- ✅ Multiple adapter patterns (file, memory, PostgreSQL)
- ✅ Extensive testing and validation
- ✅ Docker image building pipeline
- ✅ Real MCP protocol implementation
- ✅ Academic-quality documentation
**Complexity Issues:**
```bash
# Evidence from commit analysis CSV:
- "The Great Genesis": 127 files, +6076 lines (over-engineering)
- "The Build Labyrinth": Circular dependencies, complex imports
- "The Return to Simplicity": Acknowledgment of over-complexity
```
**Architectural Debt:**
- 🔶 Monorepo complexity with 10+ packages
- 🔶 Over-abstracted adapter patterns
- 🔶 Complex build dependencies
- 🔶 Docker configuration scattered across legacy folders
---
## Research Analysis: MCP Development Best Practices
Based on analysis of existing MCP ecosystem and official documentation:
### 1. **Protocol Compliance**
```typescript
// Proper MCP server structure
import { Server } from "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/index.js";
import { StdioServerTransport } from "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/stdio.js";
const server = new Server({
name: "github-events",
version: "1.0.0"
}, {
capabilities: {
tools: {},
resources: {},
prompts: {}
}
});
```
### 2. **Transport Layer Best Practices**
- **Stdio** for development and local usage
- **SSE/HTTP** for web integrations
- **Docker** for production deployments
- **Inspector** for debugging
### 3. **Docker Standards for MCP Servers**
```dockerfile
# Best practice: Multi-stage builds
FROM node:20-alpine AS builder
WORKDIR /app
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm ci --only=production
FROM node:20-alpine AS runtime
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=builder /app/node_modules ./node_modules
COPY . .
EXPOSE 3000
HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=10s --retries=3 \
CMD curl -f http://localhost:3000/health
CMD ["node", "index.js"]
```
---
## Strategic Recommendations
### 1. Repository Restructuring
#### Option A: Unified MCP Development Repository
```
sparrow-mcp/
├── servers/
│ ├── github-events/ # Python MCP server
│ ├── prompts/ # TypeScript MCP server
│ └── shared/ # Common utilities
├── docker/
│ ├── docker-compose.yml # Development environment
│ ├── Dockerfile.python # Python servers
│ └── Dockerfile.node # Node.js servers
├── docs/ # Unified documentation
└── scripts/ # Common build/deploy scripts
```
#### Option B: Specialized Repositories (Recommended)
```
mcp-github-events/ # Focused Python MCP server
├── Dockerfile
├── docker-compose.yml
├── src/
└── tests/
mcp-prompts-simplified/ # Refactored TypeScript MCP server
├── Dockerfile
├── docker-compose.yml
├── src/
└── tests/
```
**Recommendation: Option B** for better maintainability and focused development.
### 2. GitHub Events → True MCP Server Migration
#### Implementation Plan:
```python
# 1. Add MCP SDK dependency
# requirements.txt
mcp>=1.0.0
# 2. Create proper MCP server
from mcp import McpServer, StdioServerTransport
from github_events_monitor.collector import GitHubEventsCollector
async def serve():
server = McpServer("github-events")
@server.tool("get_event_counts")
async def get_event_counts(offset_minutes: int):
collector = await get_collector_instance()
return await collector.get_event_counts_by_type(offset_minutes)
# Add other tools...
async with StdioServerTransport() as transport:
await server.connect(transport)
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(serve())
```
#### Docker Enhancement:
```dockerfile
# Multi-stage build for Python MCP server
FROM python:3.11-slim AS builder
WORKDIR /app
COPY requirements.txt .
RUN pip install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txt
FROM python:3.11-slim AS runtime
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=builder /usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages /usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages
COPY src/ ./src/
ENV PYTHONPATH=/app/src
EXPOSE 8000
HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=10s --retries=3 \
CMD python -c "import requests; requests.get('http://localhost:8000/health')"
CMD ["python", "-m", "github_events_monitor.mcp_server"]
```
### 3. MCP-Prompts Simplification Strategy
#### Architectural Simplification:
```typescript
// Simplified structure (single package)
mcp-prompts/
├── src/
│ ├── server.ts # Main MCP server
│ ├── prompts/ # Prompt management
│ ├── storage/ # Simple file/postgres adapters
│ └── utils/
├── Dockerfile
├── docker-compose.yml
└── package.json # Single package.json
```
#### Consolidation Benefits:
- Reduced build complexity
- Clearer dependency management
- Faster development cycles
- Easier Docker builds
- Simplified testing
### 4. Unified Docker Development Environment
#### Development Docker Compose:
```yaml
version: '3.9'
services:
# GitHub Events MCP Server
github-events:
build:
context: ./github-events
dockerfile: Dockerfile
ports:
- "8000:8000"
environment:
- DATABASE_PATH=/app/data/github_events.db
- GITHUB_TOKEN=${GITHUB_TOKEN}
volumes:
- ./github-events/data:/app/data
- ./github-events/logs:/app/logs
healthcheck:
test: ["CMD", "curl", "-f", "http://localhost:8000/health"]
interval: 30s
timeout: 10s
retries: 3
# MCP Prompts Server
mcp-prompts:
build:
context: ./mcp-prompts
dockerfile: Dockerfile
ports:
- "3003:3003"
environment:
- STORAGE_TYPE=file
- PROMPTS_DIR=/app/data
volumes:
- ./mcp-prompts/data:/app/data
healthcheck:
test: ["CMD", "curl", "-f", "http://localhost:3003/health"]
interval: 30s
timeout: 10s
retries: 3
# MCP Inspector for debugging
inspector:
image: modelcontextprotocol/inspector:latest
ports:
- "5173:5173"
environment:
- MCP_SERVER_URL=http://github-events:8000
depends_on:
- github-events
- mcp-prompts
# Database for development
postgres:
image: postgres:16-alpine
environment:
- POSTGRES_DB=mcp_dev
- POSTGRES_USER=mcp
- POSTGRES_PASSWORD=mcp_dev_pass
ports:
- "5432:5432"
volumes:
- postgres_data:/var/lib/postgresql/data
volumes:
postgres_data:
```
#### Production Docker Optimization:
```dockerfile
# Multi-arch build example
FROM --platform=$BUILDPLATFORM node:20-alpine AS builder
ARG TARGETPLATFORM
ARG BUILDPLATFORM
WORKDIR /app
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm ci --only=production
FROM --platform=$TARGETPLATFORM node:20-alpine AS runtime
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=builder /app/node_modules ./node_modules
COPY . .
USER node
HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=10s --retries=3 \
CMD wget --no-verbose --tries=1 --spider http://localhost:3003/health
CMD ["node", "server.js"]
```
### 5. Testing and Quality Assurance
#### Integrated Testing Strategy:
```yaml
# .github/workflows/mcp-servers.yml
name: MCP Servers CI/CD
on: [push, pull_request]
jobs:
test-github-events:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Build Docker image
run: docker build -t github-events ./github-events
- name: Run tests
run: docker run --rm github-events python -m pytest
- name: Test MCP protocol
run: |
docker run -d --name gh-events github-events
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector --test docker://gh-events
test-mcp-prompts:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Setup Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: '20'
- name: Install dependencies
run: npm ci
working-directory: ./mcp-prompts
- name: Run tests
run: npm test
working-directory: ./mcp-prompts
- name: Build Docker
run: docker build -t mcp-prompts ./mcp-prompts
- name: Test Docker
run: |
docker run -d -p 3003:3003 --name prompts mcp-prompts
curl -f http://localhost:3003/health
integration-test:
needs: [test-github-events, test-mcp-prompts]
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Run docker-compose
run: docker-compose up -d
- name: Wait for services
run: sleep 30
- name: Test integration
run: |
curl -f http://localhost:8000/health
curl -f http://localhost:3003/health
# Test MCP protocol interaction
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector --batch-test
```
### 6. Development Workflow Improvements
#### Enhanced Scripts:
```bash
#!/bin/bash
# scripts/dev-setup.sh
set -e
echo "🚀 Setting up MCP development environment..."
# Check Docker
if ! docker --version > /dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "❌ Docker required but not installed"
exit 1
fi
# Check Node.js
if ! node --version > /dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "❌ Node.js required but not installed"
exit 1
fi
# Check Python
if ! python3 --version > /dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "❌ Python 3.11+ required but not installed"
exit 1
fi
# Build images
echo "📦 Building Docker images..."
docker build -t github-events ./github-events
docker build -t mcp-prompts ./mcp-prompts
# Start services
echo "🏃 Starting development environment..."
docker-compose up -d
# Wait for health checks
echo "⏳ Waiting for services to be ready..."
timeout 60 bash -c 'until curl -f http://localhost:8000/health > /dev/null 2>&1; do sleep 2; done'
timeout 60 bash -c 'until curl -f http://localhost:3003/health > /dev/null 2>&1; do sleep 2; done'
echo "✅ Development environment ready!"
echo ""
echo "🔗 Available endpoints:"
echo " • GitHub Events: http://localhost:8000"
echo " • MCP Prompts: http://localhost:3003"
echo " • Inspector: http://localhost:5173"
echo " • PostgreSQL: localhost:5432"
echo ""
echo "🛠️ Quick commands:"
echo " • View logs: docker-compose logs -f"
echo " • Stop all: docker-compose down"
echo " • Rebuild: docker-compose up --build"
```
---
## Implementation Roadmap
### Phase 1: Foundation (Week 1-2)
- [ ] Create unified repository structure
- [ ] Implement true MCP server for GitHub Events
- [ ] Simplify mcp-prompts architecture
- [ ] Establish Docker development environment
### Phase 2: Integration (Week 3-4)
- [ ] Docker Compose for multi-service development
- [ ] CI/CD pipeline for both projects
- [ ] Integration testing with MCP Inspector
- [ ] Documentation consolidation
### Phase 3: Optimization (Week 5-6)
- [ ] Performance optimization
- [ ] Multi-architecture Docker builds
- [ ] Production deployment configurations
- [ ] Monitoring and observability
### Phase 4: Enhancement (Week 7-8)
- [ ] Advanced MCP features implementation
- [ ] Cross-server protocol communication
- [ ] Extended testing scenarios
- [ ] Community documentation
---
## Risk Assessment and Mitigation
### Technical Risks
**Risk**: Breaking changes during refactoring
**Mitigation**:
- Feature flags for gradual migration
- Comprehensive test coverage
- Staged rollout approach
**Risk**: Docker build complexity
**Mitigation**:
- Multi-stage builds for optimization
- Clear documentation and examples
- Automated build validation
**Risk**: MCP protocol compatibility
**Mitigation**:
- Use official MCP SDK
- Regular testing with MCP Inspector
- Version pinning for stability
### Development Risks
**Risk**: Over-engineering (lessons from mcp-prompts history)
**Mitigation**:
- KISS principle enforcement
- Regular architecture reviews
- Focus on user value over technical elegance
**Risk**: Documentation drift
**Mitigation**:
- Documentation-driven development
- Automated doc generation where possible
- Regular review cycles
---
## Success Metrics
### Technical Metrics
- Build time reduction: Target <5 minutes for full build
- Test coverage: Maintain >90% coverage
- Docker image size: <500MB per service
- Health check response time: <100ms
### Development Metrics
- Time to first contribution: <30 minutes from git clone
- CI/CD pipeline duration: <10 minutes
- Documentation completeness: 100% API coverage
- Issue resolution time: <48 hours average
### Quality Metrics
- Zero critical security vulnerabilities
- MCP protocol compliance: 100%
- Cross-platform compatibility (Linux, macOS, Windows)
- Performance benchmarks within acceptable ranges
---
## Conclusion
The analysis reveals two mature but architecturally different projects that would benefit significantly from:
1. **Architectural Simplification**: Particularly for mcp-prompts, reducing complexity while maintaining functionality
2. **True MCP Implementation**: Converting GitHub Events from HTTP-only to proper MCP protocol
3. **Unified Development Environment**: Docker-based development with consistent practices
4. **Enhanced Testing**: Integration testing with MCP Inspector and automated validation
The recommended approach prioritizes simplicity over complexity, following the lessons learned from the mcp-prompts evolution documented in the commit analysis. The goal is robust, maintainable MCP servers that serve real user needs without architectural overhead.
**Next Steps**: Begin with Phase 1 implementation, focusing on the GitHub Events MCP server conversion as it represents the quickest path to value delivery.
---
*This analysis is based on comprehensive codebase examination, Docker testing, and research into MCP development best practices as of August 2025.*