EuConquisto Composer MCP

# Comprehensive Testing Strategy ## Task Overview **Assigned to**: Claude Desktop **Priority**: Medium **Timeline**: Strategic planning phase **Dependencies**: Resource constraints and scaling analysis ## Objective Define a comprehensive testing strategy for the EuConquisto Composer MCP server that ensures reliability, performance, and maintainability across different deployment scenarios and user volumes. ## Background Context Current testing status reveals significant gaps: - Jest configuration missing despite dependency - Test files are mostly stubs or incomplete - No end-to-end testing for browser automation - No integration tests with real MCP clients - Critical functionality (4/7 tools) currently failing - No performance or load testing framework ## Testing Strategy Areas ### 1. Unit Testing Framework **Current Gap**: Basic Jest setup needed - Complete Jest configuration for TypeScript - Test coverage requirements and targets - Mocking strategies for external dependencies - Automated test execution in CI/CD pipeline ### 2. Integration Testing **Current Gap**: No MCP client integration tests - Claude Desktop integration testing - MCP protocol compliance validation - Real JWT token integration testing - EuConquisto Composer API interaction tests ### 3. End-to-End Testing **Current Gap**: Critical for browser automation validation - Playwright automation testing framework - Real browser environment testing - DOM selector validation and maintenance - Complete composition workflow testing ### 4. Performance Testing **Current Gap**: No performance validation framework - Load testing for multiple concurrent users - Browser resource usage monitoring - Memory leak detection and prevention - Response time validation under stress ### 5. Security Testing **Current Gap**: Authentication and authorization testing - JWT token validation testing - Input sanitization and validation tests - Rate limiting and abuse prevention tests - Security vulnerability scanning ## Specific Testing Requirements ### 1. MCP Protocol Compliance Testing ```typescript // Example test areas needed describe('MCP Protocol Compliance', () => { test('Initialize handshake implementation') test('Tool discovery and registration') test('JSON-RPC 2.0 message handling') test('Error response formatting') test('Capability declaration') }) ``` ### 2. Browser Automation Testing ```typescript // Critical for current blocking issues describe('Browser Automation', () => { test('DOM selector reliability across UI updates') test('Error handling for missing elements') test('Timeout and retry mechanisms') test('Browser resource cleanup') test('Authentication flow validation') }) ``` ### 3. Tool Functionality Testing ```typescript // Validate all 7 MCP tools describe('MCP Tools', () => { test('test-connection - server connectivity') test('get-widget-info - widget analysis') test('get-composer-url - URL generation') test('create-new-composition - DOM automation') test('edit-composition-metadata - form handling') test('save-composition - persistence') test('complete-composition-workflow - end-to-end') }) ``` ## Testing Infrastructure Decisions ### 1. Test Environment Setup - **Development**: Local testing with mock services - **Staging**: Full integration with real EuConquisto environment - **CI/CD**: Automated testing pipeline with parallel execution - **Performance**: Dedicated load testing environment ### 2. Browser Testing Strategy - **Headless vs GUI**: When to use each mode - **Browser Versions**: Chromium version compatibility - **Parallel Execution**: Multiple browser instances for speed - **Screenshot/Video**: Debugging and failure analysis ### 3. Data Management - **Test Data**: Composition templates and test content - **Environment Variables**: JWT tokens and configuration - **State Management**: Test isolation and cleanup - **Mocking Strategy**: External service dependencies ## Testing Phases and Priorities ### Phase 1: Critical Path Testing (Week 1-2) **Priority**: Fix current blocking issues - DOM selector validation tests - Basic MCP tool functionality tests - Authentication flow verification - Browser automation reliability tests ### Phase 2: Integration Testing (Week 3-4) **Priority**: Validate end-to-end workflows - Claude Desktop integration tests - Complete composition lifecycle tests - Error handling and recovery tests - Performance baseline establishment ### Phase 3: Comprehensive Testing (Week 5-8) **Priority**: Production readiness validation - Load and stress testing - Security vulnerability testing - Cross-browser compatibility (if needed) - Monitoring and alerting validation ## Key Questions to Address ### 1. Testing Environment Requirements - How to set up reliable test environments? - Test data management and refresh strategies - Service dependency mocking vs real integration - CI/CD pipeline integration requirements ### 2. Browser Automation Testing - How to test DOM selector reliability? - UI change detection and test maintenance - Visual regression testing needs - Cross-environment consistency (local vs CI) ### 3. Performance Testing - Load testing tools and frameworks - Performance benchmarks and targets - Resource usage monitoring during tests - Scalability testing approaches ### 4. Security Testing - Authentication and authorization test scenarios - Input validation and sanitization testing - Rate limiting and abuse prevention validation - Security scanning tool integration ## Deliverables Expected ### 1. Testing Framework Setup - Complete Jest configuration with TypeScript - Test environment configuration and setup - CI/CD pipeline integration plan - Test data management strategy ### 2. Test Implementation Plan - Unit test coverage requirements (target: 80%+) - Integration test scenarios and priorities - End-to-end test automation framework - Performance testing methodology ### 3. Testing Operations Plan - Test environment provisioning and maintenance - Test execution scheduling and automation - Failure analysis and debugging procedures - Test result reporting and monitoring ## Success Criteria - [ ] Testing framework completely configured - [ ] Critical path tests implemented and passing - [ ] Integration testing strategy validated - [ ] Performance testing baseline established - [ ] Security testing procedures defined - [ ] CI/CD pipeline integration completed ## Risk Mitigation - **Browser Automation Brittleness**: Robust selector strategies and fallbacks - **Environment Dependencies**: Comprehensive mocking and staging environments - **Test Maintenance Overhead**: Automated test generation and maintenance tools - **Performance Test Reliability**: Consistent testing environments and benchmarks ## Follow-up Actions Results will inform: - Development timeline and resource allocation - Quality assurance processes and standards - Production deployment readiness criteria - Ongoing maintenance and monitoring requirements --- **Note**: A comprehensive testing strategy is essential for ensuring the reliability and maintainability of the browser automation approach, especially given the current 57% tool failure rate.