Atom-of-thoughts
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| AoTA | Atom of Thoughts (AoT) is a tool for solving complex problems by decomposing them into independent, reusable atomic units of thought. Unlike traditional sequential thinking, this tool enables more powerful problem solving by allowing atomic units of thought to form dependencies with each other. When to use:
Atom types:
Parameter descriptions:
Additional features:
Usage method:
|
| AoT-lightA | A lightweight version of Atom of Thoughts (AoT) designed for faster processing and quicker results. This streamlined version sacrifices some depth of analysis for speed, making it ideal for time-sensitive reasoning tasks. When to use:
Key differences from full AoT:
Atom types and parameters are the same as the full AoT tool. |
| atomcommandsB | A command tool to control the decomposition-contraction mechanism and automatic termination of Atom of Thoughts. Use this tool to access advanced features of AoT:
Command descriptions:
|
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The tools have unclear boundaries and significant functional overlap. AoT and AoT-light appear to be variants of the same core functionality, differing mainly in performance characteristics rather than distinct purposes. The atomcommands tool seems to expose features already described within AoT's decomposition-contraction mechanism, creating confusion about which tool to use for those operations.
The naming conventions are inconsistent and lack a clear pattern. AoT uses an acronym format, AoT-light adds a suffix, and atomcommands uses a compound word with no clear verb-noun structure. There's no consistent naming scheme across the three tools, making them harder to distinguish and remember.
With only 3 tools, the count feels thin for the apparent scope of complex reasoning and problem-solving. The server seems to cover a sophisticated domain that might benefit from more granular tools, but the tools themselves are broad in scope. The count isn't extreme but feels under-specified for the domain.
There are significant gaps in the tool surface for the reasoning domain. While the tools cover creation and management of thought atoms, there are no tools for querying, filtering, or analyzing existing atoms, no way to modify atom properties after creation, and no tools for collaborative or multi-session reasoning. The surface feels incomplete for the described sophisticated reasoning workflows.