Skip to main content
Glama
Actor-Critic Thinking MCP Server

Actor-Critic Thinking MCP Server

Actor-Critic Thinking MCP Server

A dual-perspective thinking analysis server based on Model Context Protocol (MCP), providing comprehensive performance evaluation through Actor-Critic methodology.

Showcase

demo1-with-thinking.png

Without Actor-Critic Thinking

demo1-without-thinking.png

Related MCP server: Sequential Thinking MCP Server

Features

  • Dual-perspective Analysis: Alternates between actor (creator/performer) and critic (analyzer/evaluator) perspectives

  • Round Tracking: Tracks rounds of dual-perspective analysis

  • Balanced Assessment: Combines empathetic understanding with objective analysis

  • Multi-dimensional Evaluation: Generates nuanced, multi-dimensional assessments

  • Actionable Feedback: Provides constructive improvement suggestions

Use Cases

  • Evaluating artistic performances, creative works, or strategic decisions

  • Analyzing the gap between intention and execution

  • Providing constructive feedback that considers both creative vision and technical execution

  • Reviewing complex scenarios that require both empathy and objectivity

  • Situations requiring balanced assessment of subjective and objective criteria

  • Performance reviews that need both self-reflection and external evaluation

  • Creative processes that benefit from iterative refinement

Parameters

Required Parameters

  • content (string): Current analysis content from the specified role perspective

  • role (string): Perspective role, options:

    • "actor": Actor perspective (empathetic/creative viewpoint)

    • "critic": Critic perspective (analytical/evaluative viewpoint)

  • nextRoundNeeded (boolean): Whether another round of actor-critic dialogue is needed

  • thoughtNumber (integer): Current thought number in the sequence (minimum: 1)

  • totalThoughts (integer): Total number of thoughts planned (must be odd and >= 3)

Role Perspective Guidelines

Actor perspective should include:

  • Understanding intentions, creative choices, emotional context, challenges faced

  • Self-reflection on performance and decision-making process

  • Explanation of creative vision and goals

Critic perspective should include:

  • Technical execution analysis, effectiveness evaluation

  • Audience impact assessment, comparative analysis

  • Objective feedback and improvement suggestions

How to use

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "actor-critic-thinking": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "mcp-server-actor-critic-thinking"]
    }
  }
}

Installation and Running

# Build the project
npm run build

# Run the server
node dist/index.js

Example Usage

System prompt:

Your task is to generate creative, memorable, and marketable product names based on the provided description and keywords. The product names should be concise (2-4 words), evocative, and easily understood by the target audience. Avoid generic or overly literal names. Instead, aim to create a name that stands out, captures the essence of the product, and leaves a lasting impression.

User prompt:

Description: A noise-canceling, wireless, over-ear headphone with a 20-hour battery life and touch controls. Designed for audiophiles and frequent travelers. Keywords: immersive, comfortable, high-fidelity, long-lasting, convenient

Best Practices

  1. Start with either actor or critic perspective

  2. Alternate between perspectives to maintain balance

  3. Continue rounds until comprehensive analysis is achieved

  4. Focus on relevant performance aspects

  5. Generate balanced assessments that honor both perspectives

  6. Provide constructive, actionable feedback

  7. Only set nextRoundNeeded to false when analysis is complete

Available Tools

1 tool
actor-critic-thinkingA

A sophisticated tool for dual-perspective performance analysis through actor-critic methodology. This tool enables comprehensive evaluation of performances, creative works, or decisions by embodying both the performer's mindset and the critic's analytical perspective. Each thought alternates between actor (creative/experiential) and critic (analytical/evaluative) viewpoints, creating a balanced assessment.

When to use this tool:

  • Evaluating artistic performances, creative works, or strategic decisions

  • Analyzing the gap between intention and execution

  • Providing constructive feedback that considers both creative vision and technical execution

  • Reviewing complex scenarios that require both empathy and objectivity

  • Situations requiring balanced assessment of subjective and objective criteria

  • Performance reviews that need both self-reflection and external evaluation

  • Creative processes that benefit from iterative refinement

Key features:

  • Alternates between actor (performer) and critic (evaluator) perspectives

  • Tracks rounds of dual-perspective analysis

  • Allows for multiple rounds of actor-critic dialogue

  • Balances empathetic understanding with objective analysis

  • Generates nuanced, multi-dimensional assessments

  • Provides actionable feedback for improvement

Parameters explained:

  • content: Your current analysis content from the specified role perspective

  • role: Either "actor" (empathetic/creative viewpoint) or "critic" (analytical/evaluative viewpoint)

  • nextRoundNeeded: True if another round of actor-critic dialogue is needed

  • thoughtNumber: Current thought number in the sequence (increments with each thought)

  • totalThoughts: Total number of thoughts planned (must be odd and >= 3)

Actor perspective should include:

  • Understanding intentions, creative choices, emotional context, challenges faced

  • Self-reflection on performance and decision-making process

  • Explanation of creative vision and goals

Critic perspective should include:

  • Technical execution analysis, effectiveness evaluation

  • Audience impact assessment, comparative analysis

  • Objective feedback and improvement suggestions

You should:

  1. Start with either actor or critic perspective

  2. Alternate between perspectives to maintain balance

  3. Continue rounds until comprehensive analysis is achieved

  4. Focus on relevant performance aspects

  5. Generate balanced assessments that honor both perspectives

  6. Provide constructive, actionable feedback

  7. Only set nextRoundNeeded to false when analysis is complete

Inputs: content (required), nextRoundNeeded (required), role (required), thoughtNumber (required), +1 more.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single tool 'actor-critic-thinking' has a clearly defined and distinct purpose focused on dual-perspective analysis, leaving no room for confusion or misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The tool name 'actor-critic-thinking' follows a consistent pattern of descriptive, hyphenated naming. Since there is only one tool, there is no inconsistency in naming conventions across the set.

    Tool Count2/5

    The server has only one tool, which feels thin for a server named 'Actor-Critic Thinking MCP Server' that suggests a broader analytical domain. While the tool is sophisticated, a single tool limits the scope and may not fully cover potential related operations like managing analysis sessions or integrating with other data sources.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool provides a specific analysis method but leaves significant gaps in the domain of performance or creative evaluation. There are no tools for creating, listing, updating, or deleting analyses, nor for handling related data such as performance records or feedback archives, making the surface incomplete for comprehensive workflow support.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessOutdated data

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables enhanced decision-making through hierarchical LLM analysis, using three specialized critique agents (positive, neutral, negative) that analyze proposals in parallel and synthesize them into comprehensive, actionable insights. Helps overcome single-model biases by providing multi-perspective evaluation of complex ideas and proposals.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables dynamic and reflective problem-solving through a structured thinking process with tools for sequential analysis, tree of thoughts, self-critique, and integration with external knowledge and codebase analysis.
      7 npm
      MIT