Skip to main content
Glama

DollhouseMCP

by DollhouseMCP
threat-assessment-report.mdโ€ข27.3 kB
--- name: "Threat Assessment Report" description: "Comprehensive threat modeling and risk assessment report with mitigation strategies" type: "template" version: "1.0.0" author: "DollhouseMCP" created: "2025-07-23" category: "security" tags: ["threat-modeling", "risk-assessment", "security-analysis", "threat-intelligence"] variables: system_name: type: "string" description: "Name of the system being assessed" required: true assessment_date: type: "string" description: "Date of the threat assessment" required: true default: "{{TODAY}}" threat_analyst: type: "string" description: "Lead threat analyst name" required: true business_owner: type: "string" description: "Business system owner" required: true methodology: type: "string" description: "Threat modeling methodology used" default: "STRIDE" enum: ["STRIDE", "PASTA", "OCTAVE", "TRIKE", "VAST"] system_criticality: type: "string" description: "Business criticality of the system" default: "high" enum: ["low", "medium", "high", "critical"] outputFormats: ["pdf", "html", "markdown", "docx"] includes: [] _dollhouseMCPTest: true _testMetadata: suite: "bundled-test-data" purpose: "General test data for DollhouseMCP system validation" created: "2025-08-20" version: "1.0.0" migrated: "2025-08-20T23:47:24.350Z" originalPath: "data/templates/threat-assessment-report.md" --- # Threat Assessment Report **System:** {{system_name}} **Assessment Date:** {{assessment_date}} **Threat Analyst:** {{threat_analyst}} **Business Owner:** {{business_owner}} **Methodology:** {{methodology}} **System Criticality:** {{system_criticality}} **Classification:** CONFIDENTIAL --- ## Executive Summary ### System Overview {{#if system_overview}} {{system_overview}} {{else}} {{system_name}} is a {{system_criticality}} business system that {{system_description}}. This threat assessment evaluates potential security risks and provides recommendations for risk mitigation. **Key System Characteristics:** - Business Function: {{business_function}} - User Base: {{user_count}} users - Data Sensitivity: {{data_sensitivity}} - Regulatory Requirements: {{compliance_requirements}} - Technology Stack: {{tech_stack}} {{/if}} ### Threat Landscape Summary {{#if threat_summary}} {{threat_summary}} {{else}} This assessment identified **{{total_threats}}** distinct threat scenarios across **{{threat_categories}}** categories. The analysis reveals **{{high_risk_threats}}** high-risk threats requiring immediate attention and **{{medium_risk_threats}}** medium-risk threats needing mitigation within the next quarter. **Most Critical Threats:** 1. {{threat_1_name}} - Risk Score: {{threat_1_score}} 2. {{threat_2_name}} - Risk Score: {{threat_2_score}} 3. {{threat_3_name}} - Risk Score: {{threat_3_score}} {{/if}} ### Risk Assessment Overview | Risk Level | Threat Count | Business Impact | Recommended Timeline | |------------|--------------|-----------------|---------------------| {{#if risk_summary}} {{#each risk_summary}} | {{level}} | {{count}} | {{impact}} | {{timeline}} | {{/each}} {{else}} | Critical | X | Severe | Immediate (0-7 days) | | High | Y | Major | Urgent (7-30 days) | | Medium | Z | Moderate | Important (30-90 days) | | Low | W | Minor | Standard (90+ days) | {{/if}} ### Key Recommendations {{#if key_recommendations}} {{#each key_recommendations}} {{@index+1}}. **{{category}}**: {{recommendation}} {{/each}} {{else}} 1. **Identity & Access Management**: Implement multi-factor authentication and privileged access controls 2. **Network Security**: Deploy network segmentation and intrusion detection systems 3. **Data Protection**: Enhance encryption and data loss prevention capabilities 4. **Monitoring & Response**: Establish security operations center and incident response procedures 5. **Security Awareness**: Conduct comprehensive security training for all users {{/if}} --- ## Threat Modeling Methodology ### Approach and Framework {{#if methodology_description}} {{methodology_description}} {{else}} This threat assessment follows the **{{methodology}}** methodology, providing a systematic approach to identify, analyze, and prioritize security threats. **{{methodology}} Categories:** {{#if methodology == "STRIDE"}} - **S**poofing: Identity and authentication threats - **T**ampering: Data and system integrity threats - **R**epudiation: Non-repudiation and audit threats - **I**nformation Disclosure: Confidentiality and privacy threats - **D**enial of Service: Availability and performance threats - **E**levation of Privilege: Authorization and access control threats {{else if methodology == "PASTA"}} - Stage 1: Define Objectives - Stage 2: Define Technical Scope - Stage 3: Application Decomposition - Stage 4: Threat Analysis - Stage 5: Weakness Analysis - Stage 6: Attack Modeling - Stage 7: Risk Analysis {{/if}} {{/if}} ### System Decomposition {{#if system_architecture}} {{system_architecture}} {{else}} #### Architecture Components ``` {{system_name}} Architecture: โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚ Web Clients โ”‚โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”‚ Load Balancer โ”‚โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”‚ Web Servers โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚ Application โ”‚ โ”‚ Servers โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚ Database โ”‚ โ”‚ Cluster โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ ``` #### Trust Boundaries 1. **Internet โ†” DMZ**: External users accessing public services 2. **DMZ โ†” Internal Network**: Web tier accessing application services 3. **Application โ†” Data Tier**: Application servers accessing databases 4. **Internal โ†” Management**: Administrative access to system components #### Data Flow Analysis - **User Authentication**: Credentials flow from client to authentication service - **Business Logic**: Application processes user requests and business rules - **Data Storage**: Sensitive data stored and retrieved from database systems - **External Integrations**: API calls to third-party services and partners {{/if}} ### Asset Inventory {{#if asset_inventory}} {{#each asset_inventory}} #### {{category}} {{#each assets}} - **{{name}}**: {{description}} (Criticality: {{criticality}}) {{/each}} {{/each}} {{else}} #### Critical Assets - **Customer Database**: Contains PII and financial data (Criticality: Critical) - **Authentication Service**: Manages user access controls (Criticality: High) - **Payment Processor**: Handles financial transactions (Criticality: Critical) - **Web Application**: Primary user interface (Criticality: High) - **API Gateway**: External integration point (Criticality: Medium) #### Supporting Assets - **Load Balancers**: Traffic distribution (Criticality: Medium) - **Monitoring Systems**: Operational visibility (Criticality: Medium) - **Backup Systems**: Data recovery capability (Criticality: High) - **Network Infrastructure**: Connectivity foundation (Criticality: Medium) {{/if}} --- ## Threat Analysis {{#if detailed_threats}} {{#each detailed_threats}} ### Threat {{@index+1}}: {{name}} **Threat ID:** {{id}} **Category:** {{category}} **Risk Score:** {{risk_score}}/10 **Priority:** {{priority}} #### Threat Description {{description}} #### Threat Actors {{#each threat_actors}} - **{{type}}**: {{capabilities}} (Motivation: {{motivation}}) {{/each}} #### Attack Scenarios {{#each attack_scenarios}} {{@index+1}}. **{{scenario_name}}** - **Prerequisites:** {{prerequisites}} - **Attack Steps:** {{attack_steps}} - **Success Criteria:** {{success_criteria}} - **Detection Difficulty:** {{detection_difficulty}} {{/each}} #### Affected Assets {{#each affected_assets}} - **{{asset_name}}**: {{impact_description}} (Impact Level: {{impact_level}}) {{/each}} #### Risk Assessment **Likelihood Assessment:** {{likelihood}}/5 - Threat Actor Capability: {{actor_capability}}/5 - Attack Complexity: {{complexity}}/5 - Required Access: {{access_required}}/5 - Detection Probability: {{detection_prob}}/5 **Impact Assessment:** {{impact}}/5 - Confidentiality Impact: {{confidentiality}}/5 - Integrity Impact: {{integrity}}/5 - Availability Impact: {{availability}}/5 - Business Impact: {{business_impact}}/5 **Risk Calculation:** ``` Risk Score = (Likelihood ร— Impact ร— Vulnerability) / Controls Risk Score = ({{likelihood}} ร— {{impact}} ร— {{vulnerability}}) / {{controls}} = {{risk_score}} ``` #### Existing Controls {{#each existing_controls}} - **{{control_name}}**: {{effectiveness}} effectiveness ({{description}}) {{/each}} #### Recommended Mitigations {{#each mitigations}} {{@index+1}}. **{{control_type}}**: {{description}} - **Implementation Cost:** {{cost}} - **Timeline:** {{timeline}} - **Risk Reduction:** {{risk_reduction}}% - **Responsible Party:** {{owner}} {{/each}} #### Residual Risk After implementing recommended mitigations: - **Residual Risk Score:** {{residual_risk}}/10 - **Acceptance Criteria:** {{acceptance_criteria}} - **Monitoring Requirements:** {{monitoring_requirements}} --- {{/each}} {{else}} ### Example Threat: SQL Injection Attack **Threat ID:** THR-001 **Category:** Tampering (STRIDE) **Risk Score:** 8.5/10 **Priority:** Critical #### Threat Description Attackers exploit insufficient input validation in web application forms to inject malicious SQL commands, potentially gaining unauthorized access to the database and sensitive customer information. #### Threat Actors - **External Attackers**: Script kiddies to advanced persistent threat groups (Motivation: Data theft, financial gain) - **Malicious Insiders**: Employees with database access (Motivation: Financial gain, revenge) #### Attack Scenarios 1. **Unauthenticated SQL Injection** - **Prerequisites:** Web application accessible, input validation missing - **Attack Steps:** Submit malicious SQL in form fields, extract database contents - **Success Criteria:** Access to user accounts or sensitive data - **Detection Difficulty:** Medium (depends on logging) 2. **Authenticated SQL Injection** - **Prerequisites:** Valid user account, application access - **Attack Steps:** Escalate privileges through SQL injection in authenticated features - **Success Criteria:** Administrative access to database - **Detection Difficulty:** High (legitimate user activity) #### Affected Assets - **Customer Database**: Complete data exposure (Impact Level: Critical) - **User Authentication**: Account takeover possible (Impact Level: High) - **Payment Data**: Financial information at risk (Impact Level: Critical) #### Risk Assessment **Likelihood Assessment:** 4/5 - Threat Actor Capability: 3/5 (Moderate skill required) - Attack Complexity: 2/5 (Automated tools available) - Required Access: 1/5 (No special access needed) - Detection Probability: 3/5 (May avoid detection) **Impact Assessment:** 5/5 - Confidentiality Impact: 5/5 (Complete data exposure) - Integrity Impact: 4/5 (Data modification possible) - Availability Impact: 3/5 (Database could be corrupted) - Business Impact: 5/5 (Regulatory violations, customer loss) **Risk Calculation:** ``` Risk Score = (4 ร— 5 ร— 4) / 2 = 40/2 = 8.5/10 ``` #### Existing Controls - **Input Validation**: Low effectiveness (Basic client-side only) - **Database Permissions**: Medium effectiveness (Some access restrictions) - **Web Application Firewall**: Not implemented #### Recommended Mitigations 1. **Parameterized Queries**: Implement prepared statements for all database queries - **Implementation Cost:** $15,000 - **Timeline:** 4-6 weeks - **Risk Reduction:** 80% - **Responsible Party:** Development Team 2. **Input Validation Framework**: Deploy comprehensive server-side validation - **Implementation Cost:** $25,000 - **Timeline:** 6-8 weeks - **Risk Reduction:** 70% - **Responsible Party:** Security Team 3. **Database Activity Monitoring**: Implement real-time SQL injection detection - **Implementation Cost:** $40,000 - **Timeline:** 2-3 weeks - **Risk Reduction:** 60% - **Responsible Party:** Operations Team #### Residual Risk After implementing recommended mitigations: - **Residual Risk Score:** 2.5/10 - **Acceptance Criteria:** Acceptable with continuous monitoring - **Monitoring Requirements:** Daily review of database access logs --- {{/if}} ## Attack Tree Analysis ### High-Priority Attack Trees {{#if attack_trees}} {{#each attack_trees}} #### {{goal}} ``` {{tree_structure}} ``` **Key Insights:** {{#each insights}} - {{insight}} {{/each}} **Mitigation Focus Areas:** {{#each mitigation_areas}} - {{area}}: {{description}} {{/each}} {{/each}} {{else}} #### Goal: Gain Unauthorized Access to Customer Data ``` Steal Customer Data โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ OR โ”€ Database Direct Access โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ AND โ”€ SQL Injection โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ Unvalidated Input โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ Dynamic Query Construction โ”‚ โ”‚ โ””โ”€ Database Errors Exposed โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”‚ โ””โ”€ AND โ”€ Privilege Escalation โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ Initial Database Access โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ Weak Database Permissions โ”‚ โ””โ”€ Inadequate Monitoring โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ OR โ”€ Application Compromise โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ AND โ”€ Authentication Bypass โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ Weak Password Policy โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ No Multi-Factor Auth โ”‚ โ”‚ โ””โ”€ Session Management Flaws โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”‚ โ””โ”€ AND โ”€ Authorization Bypass โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ Insecure Direct Object Refs โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ Missing Function Level Checks โ”‚ โ””โ”€ Privilege Escalation Bugs โ”‚ โ””โ”€ OR โ”€ Infrastructure Attack โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ AND โ”€ Network Intrusion โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ Vulnerable Network Services โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ Weak Network Segmentation โ”‚ โ””โ”€ Insufficient Monitoring โ”‚ โ””โ”€ AND โ”€ System Compromise โ”œโ”€ Operating System Vulnerabilities โ”œโ”€ Misconfigurations โ””โ”€ Backdoor Installation ``` **Key Insights:** - Multiple attack paths exist to achieve the same goal - Authentication and input validation are critical control points - Network segmentation could limit attack impact - Monitoring and detection capabilities need improvement **Mitigation Focus Areas:** - **Input Validation**: Implement comprehensive validation framework - **Authentication**: Deploy multi-factor authentication - **Network Security**: Enhance segmentation and monitoring - **Database Security**: Implement least privilege access controls {{/if}} --- ## Risk Prioritization Matrix ### Risk Scoring Methodology ``` Risk Score = (Threat Likelihood ร— Business Impact ร— Technical Impact) / Control Effectiveness Where each factor is scored 1-5: - Threat Likelihood: Probability of successful attack - Business Impact: Consequence to business operations - Technical Impact: Severity of technical compromise - Control Effectiveness: Current mitigation strength ``` ### Prioritized Risk Register {{#if risk_register}} | Rank | Threat | Risk Score | Likelihood | Impact | Controls | Priority | |------|--------|------------|------------|--------|----------|----------| {{#each risk_register}} | {{rank}} | {{threat_name}} | {{risk_score}} | {{likelihood}} | {{impact}} | {{controls}} | {{priority}} | {{/each}} {{else}} | Rank | Threat | Risk Score | Likelihood | Impact | Controls | Priority | |------|--------|------------|------------|--------|----------|----------| | 1 | SQL Injection | 8.5 | High | Critical | Weak | Critical | | 2 | Authentication Bypass | 7.8 | Medium | High | Medium | High | | 3 | Data Exfiltration | 7.2 | Medium | Critical | Medium | High | | 4 | Privilege Escalation | 6.9 | High | Medium | Medium | High | | 5 | Denial of Service | 6.1 | High | Medium | Strong | Medium | | 6 | Session Hijacking | 5.8 | Medium | Medium | Weak | Medium | | 7 | Cross-Site Scripting | 5.2 | High | Low | Medium | Medium | | 8 | Information Disclosure | 4.9 | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low | {{/if}} ### Risk Heat Map {{#if risk_heatmap}} {{risk_heatmap}} {{else}} ``` Impact โ†’ Low Medium High Critical Likelihood โ†“ Very High | 6 | 7 | 1 | 2 | High | 8 | 5 | 4 | - | Medium | - | 6 | 3 | - | Low | - | - | - | - | Very Low | - | - | - | - | Legend: Numbers represent threat IDs from risk register ``` {{/if}} --- ## Mitigation Strategy ### Defense-in-Depth Approach {{#if defense_strategy}} {{defense_strategy}} {{else}} #### Layer 1: Perimeter Security - **Network Firewalls**: Control traffic between network segments - **Web Application Firewall**: Filter malicious web traffic - **DDoS Protection**: Mitigate distributed denial of service attacks - **VPN Gateways**: Secure remote access connections #### Layer 2: Network Security - **Network Segmentation**: Isolate critical systems and data - **Intrusion Detection/Prevention**: Monitor for malicious activity - **Network Access Control**: Authenticate and authorize device access - **Traffic Analysis**: Monitor for anomalous network behavior #### Layer 3: Host Security - **Endpoint Protection**: Anti-malware and behavioral analysis - **System Hardening**: Secure configuration management - **Patch management**: Timely security update deployment - **Host-based Monitoring**: Local security event collection #### Layer 4: Application Security - **Secure Development**: Security built into SDLC processes - **Input Validation**: Comprehensive data sanitization - **Authentication**: Multi-factor authentication implementation - **Authorization**: Role-based access controls #### Layer 5: Data Security - **Encryption**: Data protection in transit and at rest - **Data Classification**: Sensitivity-based handling procedures - **Data Loss Prevention**: Monitor and prevent data exfiltration - **Backup Security**: Secure and tested backup procedures {{/if}} ### Recommended Security Controls {{#if security_controls}} {{#each security_controls}} #### {{category}} {{#each controls}} - **{{name}}**: {{description}} - Priority: {{priority}} - Cost: {{cost}} - Timeline: {{timeline}} - Risk Reduction: {{risk_reduction}}% {{/each}} {{/each}} {{else}} #### Critical Priority (0-30 days) - **Multi-Factor Authentication**: Deploy MFA for all user accounts - Priority: Critical - Cost: $50,000 - Timeline: 2-3 weeks - Risk Reduction: 70% - **Input Validation Framework**: Implement comprehensive validation - Priority: Critical - Cost: $75,000 - Timeline: 4-6 weeks - Risk Reduction: 80% #### High Priority (1-3 months) - **Network Segmentation**: Isolate critical systems - Priority: High - Cost: $150,000 - Timeline: 8-12 weeks - Risk Reduction: 60% - **Security Monitoring**: Deploy SIEM and SOC capabilities - Priority: High - Cost: $200,000 - Timeline: 10-14 weeks - Risk Reduction: 50% #### Medium Priority (3-6 months) - **Endpoint Protection**: Advanced threat protection - Priority: Medium - Cost: $100,000 - Timeline: 6-8 weeks - Risk Reduction: 40% - **Security Training**: Comprehensive awareness program - Priority: Medium - Cost: $25,000 - Timeline: 3-4 weeks - Risk Reduction: 30% {{/if}} --- ## Implementation Roadmap ### Phase 1: Critical Risk Mitigation (0-3 months) {{#if phase1_plan}} {{phase1_plan}} {{else}} **Objectives:** Address critical and high-risk threats that could result in significant business impact. **Key Activities:** - Deploy multi-factor authentication across all systems - Implement comprehensive input validation framework - Establish security monitoring and incident response capabilities - Conduct emergency security awareness training - Perform immediate vulnerability remediation **Success Metrics:** - 90% reduction in critical risk threats - MFA deployment to 100% of users - 24/7 security monitoring operational - Zero tolerance for critical vulnerabilities **Budget:** $400,000 **Timeline:** 12 weeks **Responsible:** Security Team, Development Team {{/if}} ### Phase 2: Comprehensive Security Enhancement (3-6 months) {{#if phase2_plan}} {{phase2_plan}} {{else}} **Objectives:** Implement defense-in-depth strategy and strengthen overall security posture. **Key Activities:** - Deploy network segmentation and micro-segmentation - Implement advanced threat protection and endpoint security - Establish security operations center (SOC) - Conduct comprehensive penetration testing - Develop incident response and business continuity plans **Success Metrics:** - 70% reduction in high-risk threats - Network segmentation 95% complete - Mean time to detect (MTTD) < 1 hour - Mean time to respond (MTTR) < 4 hours **Budget:** $600,000 **Timeline:** 12 weeks **Responsible:** Security Team, Infrastructure Team {{/if}} ### Phase 3: Security Maturity and Optimization (6-12 months) {{#if phase3_plan}} {{phase3_plan}} {{else}} **Objectives:** Achieve security maturity and establish continuous improvement processes. **Key Activities:** - Implement advanced threat intelligence and analytics - Deploy automated security testing and DevSecOps - Establish security metrics and KPI tracking - Conduct regular security assessments and audits - Develop security community of practice **Success Metrics:** - 50% reduction in medium-risk threats - 99.9% security tool availability - Zero security incidents with major business impact - Security maturity level 4 (Optimized) **Budget:** $300,000 **Timeline:** 24 weeks **Responsible:** All Teams {{/if}} --- ## Monitoring and Measurement ### Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) {{#if risk_indicators}} {{#each risk_indicators}} - **{{name}}**: {{description}} - Threshold: {{threshold}} - Measurement: {{measurement}} - Reporting: {{frequency}} {{/each}} {{else}} - **Critical Vulnerability Count**: Number of unpatched critical vulnerabilities - Threshold: 0 vulnerabilities > 7 days old - Measurement: Weekly vulnerability scans - Reporting: Weekly executive dashboard - **Failed Authentication Attempts**: Anomalous login attempt patterns - Threshold: >50 failed attempts per user per hour - Measurement: Real-time authentication logs - Reporting: Immediate alerting - **Privileged Access Usage**: Administrative account activity monitoring - Threshold: >5 simultaneous admin sessions - Measurement: Continuous privileged access monitoring - Reporting: Daily review and monthly reporting {{/if}} ### Security Metrics Dashboard {{#if security_metrics}} {{security_metrics}} {{else}} **Risk Posture Metrics:** - Overall Risk Score: [Current score vs target] - Critical Threats Remaining: [Count and trend] - Control Implementation Progress: [Percentage complete] - Residual Risk Acceptance: [Approved vs total] **Operational Security Metrics:** - Security Incident Count: [Monthly incidents by severity] - Mean Time to Detect: [Average detection time] - Mean Time to Respond: [Average response time] - Control Effectiveness: [Pass/fail rates for security controls] **Business Impact Metrics:** - Security Investment ROI: [Risk reduction per dollar spent] - Compliance Status: [Percentage of requirements met] - Security Awareness: [Training completion and phishing click rates] - Customer Trust Index: [Security-related satisfaction scores] {{/if}} --- ## Conclusion and Next Steps ### Assessment Summary {{#if assessment_conclusion}} {{assessment_conclusion}} {{else}} This comprehensive threat assessment of {{system_name}} identified significant security risks that require immediate attention. While the system provides critical business functionality, the current security posture presents unacceptable risks to the organization. **Key Findings:** - {{total_critical_threats}} critical threats require immediate remediation - Current security controls are insufficient for the system's risk profile - Implementation of recommended mitigations will reduce overall risk by 75% - Estimated investment of $1.3M over 12 months to achieve target security posture {{/if}} ### Immediate Actions Required {{#if immediate_next_steps}} {{#each immediate_next_steps}} {{@index+1}}. **{{action}}** (Due: {{due_date}}, Owner: {{owner}}) {{/each}} {{else}} 1. **Executive Approval** (Due: Within 48 hours, Owner: {{business_owner}}) - Approve security investment and implementation roadmap - Assign dedicated resources for critical risk mitigation 2. **Critical Vulnerability Remediation** (Due: Within 7 days, Owner: Development Team) - Address all critical findings identified in this assessment - Implement temporary compensating controls where necessary 3. **Incident Response Activation** (Due: Immediate, Owner: Security Team) - Activate enhanced monitoring for identified threat scenarios - Prepare incident response team for potential security events {{/if}} ### Long-term Strategic Recommendations {{#if strategic_next_steps}} {{strategic_next_steps}} {{else}} 1. **Security Program Maturity**: Establish comprehensive information security program 2. **Regular Assessments**: Conduct quarterly threat modeling and annual penetration testing 3. **Security Culture**: Develop security-conscious organizational culture 4. **Threat Intelligence**: Implement proactive threat intelligence program 5. **Continuous Improvement**: Establish security metrics and continuous improvement processes {{/if}} ### Review and Update Schedule {{#if review_schedule}} {{review_schedule}} {{else}} - **Quarterly Reviews**: Update threat landscape and risk assessments - **Annual Assessment**: Complete threat model refresh and validation - **Triggered Reviews**: Major system changes, security incidents, or regulatory updates - **Next Scheduled Review**: {{next_review_date}} {{/if}} --- **Report prepared by:** {{threat_analyst}} **Technical reviewers:** {{#if technical_reviewers}}{{technical_reviewers}}{{else}}[Senior security architects]{{/if}} **Business approval:** {{business_owner}} **Document classification:** CONFIDENTIAL **Retention period:** 3 years from assessment date *This threat assessment contains sensitive security information and should be handled according to organizational data classification policies.*

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/DollhouseMCP/DollhouseMCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server