Skip to main content
Glama
CodeByWaqas

Weather MCP Server

by CodeByWaqas

天气 MCP 服务器

铁匠徽章

使用 OpenWeatherMap API 提供天气信息的现代代码协议 (MCP) 服务器。

特征

  • 实时天气数据检索

  • 温度的公制单位

  • 详细的天气信息包括:

    • 温度

    • 湿度

    • 风速

    • 日出/日落时间

    • 天气描述

Related MCP server: Open Weather13 MCP Server

先决条件

  • Python 3.12 或更高版本

  • OpenWeatherMap API 密钥

安装

通过 Smithery 安装

要通过Smithery自动为 Claude Desktop 安装 Weather MCP 服务器:

npx -y @smithery/cli install @CodeByWaqas/weather-mcp-server --client claude

手动安装

  1. 克隆存储库

  2. 创建虚拟环境:

python -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate  # On Windows use: .venv\Scripts\activate
  1. 安装依赖项:

pip install -e .

设置说明

使用 Claude Desktop 进行设置

# claude_desktop_config.json
# Can find location through:
# Claude -> Settings -> Developer -> Edit Config
{
  "mcpServers": {
      "mcp-weather-project": {
          "command": "uv",
          "args": [
              "--directory",
              "/<absolute-path>/weather-mcp-server/src/resources",
              "run",
              "server.py"
          ],
          "env": {
            "WEATHER_API_KEY": "YOUR_API_KEY"
          }
      }
  }
}

本地/开发设置说明

克隆仓库

git clone https://github.com/CodeByWaqas/weather-mcp-server

安装依赖项

安装 MCP 服务器依赖项:

cd weather-mcp-server

# Create virtual environment and activate it
uv venv

source .venv/bin/activate # MacOS/Linux
# OR
.venv/Scripts/activate # Windows

# Install dependencies
uv add "mcp[cli]" python-dotenv requests httpx

配置

  1. src/resources/env.example复制到src/resources/.env

  2. 将您的 OpenWeatherMap API 密钥添加到.env文件:

WEATHER_API_KEY=your_api_key_here

用法

运行 Claude Desktop 并使用 LLM 检索天气信息

执照

该项目根据 MIT 许可证获得许可 - 有关详细信息,请参阅 LICENSE 文件。

Available Tools

1 tool
weatherC

It fetches the latest weather reports for the given city. Args: city (str): The city name for which weather reports are required. Returns: dict: The weather reports for the given city.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cityYes

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It states the tool fetches 'latest' reports, implying real-time or recent data, but doesn't disclose behavioral traits like rate limits, error handling, data sources, or whether it's read-only. For a tool with no annotations, this leaves significant gaps in understanding its operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is appropriately sized and front-loaded, with the purpose stated first. The Args and Returns sections are structured but could be more integrated. It avoids unnecessary details, though the formatting with quotes and line breaks is slightly awkward.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and low parameter semantics coverage, the description is incomplete. It lacks information on return format details (beyond 'dict'), error cases, or operational constraints. For a tool fetching external data, this leaves the agent with insufficient context to use it effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds minimal semantics beyond the input schema. It explains that 'city' is 'The city name for which weather reports are required,' which clarifies the parameter's purpose but doesn't provide format details (e.g., city name conventions) or examples. With 0% schema description coverage and 1 parameter, the baseline is 4, but the description only partially compensates, so a 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'fetches the latest weather reports for the given city.' It specifies the verb ('fetches') and resource ('weather reports'), though it doesn't need to distinguish from siblings since none exist. The purpose is specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It mentions the city parameter but offers no context about prerequisites, limitations, or typical use cases. With no siblings, this is less critical, but the description still lacks usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool update
    • First observedweather

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single tool has a clear, distinct purpose of fetching weather reports for a city.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name 'weather' is straightforward and descriptive. Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect with no deviations or mixed conventions to evaluate.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool for a weather server is too few for the apparent scope, as it lacks essential operations like forecasts, historical data, or multi-location queries. This minimal set limits functionality and may cause agent failures in broader weather-related tasks.

Completeness2/5

The tool surface is severely incomplete for a weather domain, missing obvious gaps such as forecasts, alerts, or location-based searches. While it covers basic current weather, agents will struggle with common weather-related workflows due to these significant omissions.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that provides real-time weather data, hourly forecasts, and daily summaries using the free Open-Meteo API with no API key required. It enables users to search for weather conditions by specific coordinates or city names across multiple measurement units.
    1
    MIT
  • F
    license
    C
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that provides access to current weather data and 5-day forecasts via the Open Weather13 API. It enables users to retrieve weather information using city names or geographic coordinates across various languages.
    3
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server that wraps the Open-Meteo API to provide current weather, forecasts, and historical data for any location without requiring an API key.
    MIT

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/CodeByWaqas/weather-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server