Database Updater MCP Server
Allows importing data from CSV and Excel files into MongoDB databases
Allows importing data from CSV and Excel files into MySQL databases
Allows importing data from CSV and Excel files into PostgreSQL databases
Allows importing data from CSV and Excel files into SQLite databases
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Database Updater MCP Serverupdate the customers table in PostgreSQL with data from /data/customers.csv"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
database-updater MCP Server
A Model Context Protocol server for updating databases from CSV and Excel files.
Features
Tools
update_database- Update database from CSV/Excel filesSupports CSV and Excel (.xlsx, .xls) file formats
Compatible with multiple database types (PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, SQLite)
Configurable connection settings and table mapping
create_note- Create and manage notes (for documentation)Store important information about database updates
Track changes and modifications
Related MCP server: MCP Database Server
Usage
Update Database
Use the update_database tool with the following parameters:
{
"filePath": "/path/to/your/file.csv",
"databaseType": "PostgreSQL",
"connectionString": "postgresql://user:pass@localhost:5432/db",
"tableName": "target_table"
}Supported Database Types
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MongoDB
SQLite
Development
Install dependencies:
npm installBuild the server:
npm run buildFor development with auto-rebuild:
npm run watchInstallation
To use with Claude Desktop, add the server config:
On MacOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
On Windows: %APPDATA%/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"database-updater": {
"command": "/path/to/database-updater/build/index.js"
}
}
}Debugging
Since MCP servers communicate over stdio, debugging can be challenging. We recommend using the MCP Inspector:
npm run inspectorThe Inspector will provide a URL to access debugging tools in your browser.
Available Tools
2 toolscreate_noteC
Create a new note
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| title | Yes | Title of the note | |
| content | Yes | Text content of the note |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states 'Create a new note', implying a write operation, but does not disclose any behavioral traits like permissions needed, whether the creation is idempotent, error handling, or response format. This leaves significant gaps for a mutation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description 'Create a new note' is extremely concise and front-loaded, consisting of a single, direct sentence with no wasted words. It efficiently communicates the core action without unnecessary elaboration.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given that this is a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not address behavioral aspects like what happens on success or failure, nor does it provide context for usage relative to siblings. The 100% schema coverage helps with parameters, but overall completeness is lacking for effective tool invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage, with clear documentation for 'title' and 'content' parameters. The description does not add any semantic details beyond what the schema provides, such as format constraints or examples. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate as the schema handles parameter documentation adequately.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Create a new note' clearly states the action (create) and resource (note), making the purpose understandable. However, it lacks specificity about what a 'note' entails in this context and does not distinguish it from sibling tools like 'update_database', which could involve similar data operations.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as the sibling tool 'update_database'. It does not mention prerequisites, context for creation, or any exclusions, leaving the agent without usage instructions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
update_databaseC
Update the database from a CSV or Excel file
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| filePath | Yes | Path to the CSV or Excel file | |
| databaseType | Yes | Type of database (e.g., PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, SQLite) | |
| connectionString | Yes | Connection string for the database | |
| tableName | Yes | Name of the table to update |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the tool updates a database, implying a mutation operation, but fails to describe critical behaviors such as required permissions, whether the update is destructive or additive, error handling, or any rate limits. This is a significant gap for a tool that performs database writes.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's purpose without unnecessary words. It is front-loaded with the core action and resource, making it easy to parse. Every part of the sentence contributes essential information, earning its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of a database update tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It lacks details on the update behavior (e.g., whether it overwrites or merges data), expected outcomes, error conditions, or security considerations. This leaves the agent with insufficient context for safe and effective use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema already documents all four parameters thoroughly. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, such as explaining how parameters interact or providing examples. This meets the baseline for high schema coverage but doesn't enhance parameter understanding.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Update') and resource ('the database'), specifying the source format ('from a CSV or Excel file'). It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'create_note' by focusing on database operations rather than note creation. However, it doesn't specify what 'update' entails (e.g., insert, upsert, replace), keeping it from a perfect score.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or exclusions. It mentions the source file types but doesn't explain when this tool is appropriate compared to other database operations or data import methods. This lack of context leaves the agent with minimal usage direction.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
The two tools have completely distinct purposes with no overlap: create_note is for creating a new note, while update_database is for updating a database from a file. An agent can easily tell them apart based on their different functions and target resources (note vs. database).
The naming is inconsistent: create_note follows a verb_noun pattern, but update_database uses a verb_noun pattern with a different verb style (update vs. create) and lacks a clear object for the update action. While both are readable, they do not follow a predictable or uniform convention across the set.
With only 2 tools, this server feels thin for a 'Database Updater' purpose. The scope suggests operations like querying, deleting, or managing database entries, but only update_database directly relates, while create_note seems out of place. This mismatch makes the count inappropriate for the apparent domain.
The tool surface is significantly incomplete for a database updater server. There are no tools for reading, deleting, or querying the database, and create_note does not align with the core domain. This leaves obvious gaps that will hinder agents in performing typical database operations.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Query 40 databases from Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor — on any device. Read-only, encrypted, audited.
Query your warehouse or a CSV with Claude/ChatGPT over MCP, governed by table-level ACL + audit.
One workspace of tools for Claude and ChatGPT: connect 600+ apps, generate media, build tools.
Connect Claude to Fathom meeting recordings, transcripts, and summaries
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides Claude Desktop with secure access to multiple database connections, allowing users to query MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and SQL Server databases directly through natural language.
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides Claude with direct access to databases including SQLite, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, and MySQL, enabling execution of SQL queries and table management through natural language.8061MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to connect to and interact with SQLite, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, and MySQL databases through natural language. Supports executing queries, managing tables, exporting data, and storing business insights with authentication options including AWS IAM.806MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to query and manage databases (SQLite, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL) through natural language, supporting read/write operations and schema management.806MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AnuragRai017/database-updater-MCP-Server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server