Get 8DX WalletConnect Session

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It does convey that the operation is read-only via 'Reads' and hedges with 'if any', but it omits important traits such as whether it waits for a pending approval (despite the waitMs parameter) or what happens when no session exists. The schema parameter description adds some context, but the tool description itself lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is direct and free of fluff. It front-loads the action and resource, making it immediately clear what the tool does. There is no wasted wording, so it earns full marks for conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a simple tool with one optional parameter and no output schema. The description gives the basic purpose but does not explain return structure, error cases, or the effect of waitMs. Since there is no output schema to rely on, the description should provide more context about expected results and edge cases, leaving clear gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for the single waitMs parameter, so the baseline is 3 even without additional parameter info in the tool description. The description does not add any meaning beyond the schema, but it does not need to given the high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Reads' and identifies the resource as 'the current WalletConnect session and connected wallet account'. This clearly states the tool's function. However, it does not explicitly distinguish itself from the sibling tool eightdx_get_wallet_session, which could be similar in scope, so it falls just short of a top score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It simply states what it does without mentioning any context, prerequisites, or exclusions. There is no mention of other tools or scenarios where this tool is preferred or not.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.