Disconnect 8DX WalletConnect Session

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It reveals that the tool is idempotent when no session exists ('if one exists'), which is useful, but it does not describe side effects (e.g., whether local state is cleared, if it's reversible, or whether authentication is required). For a disconnect action, this is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that immediately communicates the action and the key condition. Every word earns its place without unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, no-output-schema tool, the description sufficiently covers the essential action and the conditional behavior. It lacks explicit return-value information, but given the simplicity of the tool, this is not a critical omission.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to explain. The baseline for 0 parameters is 4, and the description is unaffected by parameter-related gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the specific action: disconnecting the current WalletConnect session. The verb 'Disconnects' and resource 'current WalletConnect session' precisely identify the tool's function, distinguishing it from siblings like create_session, get_session, and logout_wallet.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when a WalletConnect session exists and needs to be disconnected, but does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use it. The conditional phrase 'if one exists' provides some context, but there is no explicit guidance relative to sibling session management tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.