Get 8DX Wallet Links

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It transparently states the tool does not connect or sign, which is a key behavioral trait, and specifies the output format (deeplink and web fallback). While it doesn't mention prerequisites like authentication, the disclosure is sufficient for a simple link-building utility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose and followed by a clarifying limitation. Every word earns its place with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple link builder, the description covers the outputs and explicitly states the non-connection behavior, which is important context relative to sibling tools. It could mention the return format, but with no output schema and low complexity, the description is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%; both parameters have descriptive schema text (routeUrl as the URL to open, walletApp as optional preferred wallet). The tool description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool builds wallet handoff links for an 8DX route, specifying output types (MetaMask Mobile dapp deeplink and web fallback). It also distinguishes from siblings by explicitly noting it does not connect or sign, making the purpose unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context that this tool only builds links and does not perform connection or signing, implying it should be used when links are needed rather than actual wallet actions. However, it does not explicitly name alternative tools or state 'use X instead', so it lacks full exclusion guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.