Set and store the active visual style in the parameter state for CAD drawings and mapping layouts, so subsequent operations apply consistent rendering.
Store active visual style in parameter state.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| style | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations are absent, so the description must disclose behavior. It says 'Store ... in parameter state', implying a mutation, but does not explain side effects, persistence, required context, or what the active visual style affects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Very short single sentence with no wasted words, but it is under-specified for a state-changing tool. The structure is front-loaded, yet 'parameter state' is unclear.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no annotations and no output schema, the description should carry more weight. For a setter that changes visual style, it omits what visual styles are valid and what state is affected.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%: the sole parameter 'style' is an undocumented string. The description implies it holds the active visual style, but gives no valid values, format, or examples.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States the verb 'Store' and resource 'active visual style', so the basic action is identifiable. However 'parameter state' is vague, and the description does not distinguish it from sibling setters like set_parameter or set_entity_property.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No when-to-use guidance, no alternatives, and no prerequisites. Sibling tools include set_parameter and many other set_* operations, but the description gives no routing information.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.