add_baseline_dimension

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, yet it discloses nothing about what is created, required drawing/context state, units, or whether the operation is undoable. A single restated noun phrase gives the agent zero behavioral context for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single short sentence, but the brevity is under-specification rather than conciseness — there is no front-loaded useful information because the sentence contains no information beyond the name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter mutation tool with a nested schema, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is completely inadequate. Nothing an agent needs to call it correctly is present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning for either required parameter. The nested 'points' array of x/y objects (minItems 1) and the numeric 'baseline' value are entirely undocumented, leaving the agent to guess their semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

'Add baseline dimensions' merely restates the tool name. It does not explain what a baseline dimension is or how it differs from the many sibling dimension tools (add_linear_dimension, add_continued_dimension, add_ordinate_dimension, etc.), so an agent cannot distinguish it without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance and no mention of alternatives, despite a crowded sibling set of dimension tools that overlap heavily. The only inference available is that this adds some kind of dimension.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.