Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to CAD MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      D
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-based interaction with AutoCAD and DXF/DWG drawings, supporting document lifecycle, entities, layers, blocks, layouts, viewports, zoom, screenshot capture, and PDF export via ezdxf or live Windows AutoCAD COM backends.
      50
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for full AutoCAD automation, AutoCAD LT automation, and headless DXF generation. It provides 8 consolidated tools for drawing, entity, layer, block, annotation, P&ID, view, and system operations via MCP stdio transport.
      12
      15
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables programmatic control of AutoCAD through COM automation, allowing natural language commands to create structures, manage layers, and manipulate entities via MCP clients like Claude.
      62
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI/natural-language-driven 2D drafting automation on a running Windows AutoCAD, exposing drawing, dimensioning, layer/block management, and mechanical drawing tools such as title blocks, BOM, and balloons to any MCP client.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Natural-language MCP bridge for AutoCAD 2024. Enables users to inspect and edit DWG drawings, manage layers, entities, layouts, styles, and system variables; draw 2D geometry and 3D solids; perform measurements and transactional edits; and export to DWG, STL, PDF, DWF, SVG, or raster formats through a local named-pipe connection.
      17
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables natural-language control of AutoCAD via file IPC or headless DXF generation, with tools for drawing, entities, layers, blocks, annotations, P&ID, views, and system operations.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.2/5.0

    Scored across 225 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools overlap heavily: dimension annotations vs dimension constraints (add_dimension_linear vs add_linear_dimension, add_dimension_angular vs add_angular_dimension), multiple measurement/bounding-box tools, aliases like open_project and get_layer_list, and parallel internal-CAD vs AutoCAD COM operations. With 225 tools, an agent faces frequent ambiguity and near-duplicate selection risks.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names are overwhelmingly snake_case, but verb conventions are inconsistent (create/add/set/get/list/measure/compute/import/export/generate/render/apply), with direct aliases and a few single-word or noun-first tools (offset, shell, loft, draft_angle). Still generally readable, but not a predictable verb_noun pattern throughout.

    Tool Count1/5

    225 tools is an extreme mismatch for an MCP server, far beyond the 3-15 well-scoped range. The set is massively overgrown and likely overwhelming for agents to navigate.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface is broad across 2D/3D creation, annotation, dimensions, layers, blocks, constraints, assemblies, measurement, import/export, and geospatial workflows. However, core CAD editing gaps remain (e.g., no obvious move/rotate/scale for existing 2D entities), and many tools are explicitly simplified or stub-like.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues