Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to CAD MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to connect to and automate AutoCAD on Windows via COM, exposing tools to inspect drawings and layers, create geometry and text, manage system variables, run commands, and save or open drawings. Requires full AutoCAD running with a drawing open.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-based interaction with AutoCAD and DXF/DWG drawings, supporting document lifecycle, entities, layers, blocks, layouts, viewports, zoom, screenshot capture, and PDF export via ezdxf or live Windows AutoCAD COM backends.
      87
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for full AutoCAD automation, AutoCAD LT automation, and headless DXF generation. It provides 8 consolidated tools for drawing, entity, layer, block, annotation, P&ID, view, and system operations via MCP stdio transport.
      12
      38
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables programmatic control of AutoCAD through COM automation, allowing natural language commands to create structures, manage layers, and manipulate entities via MCP clients like Claude.
      67
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to create, inspect, and modify DXF and native DWG drawings through 101 cad_* tools, including layers, blocks, DWG title frames, layout viewports, page setups, and PDF plotting. DXF workflows run without AutoCAD, while DWG, print-resource, and field-linked operations require a locally running AutoCAD instance on Windows.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI/natural-language-driven 2D drafting automation on a running Windows AutoCAD, exposing drawing, dimensioning, layer/block management, and mechanical drawing tools such as title blocks, BOM, and balloons to any MCP client.
      247 PyPI
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.2/5.0

    Scored across 225 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools overlap heavily: dimension annotations vs dimension constraints (add_dimension_linear vs add_linear_dimension, add_dimension_angular vs add_angular_dimension), multiple measurement/bounding-box tools, aliases like open_project and get_layer_list, and parallel internal-CAD vs AutoCAD COM operations. With 225 tools, an agent faces frequent ambiguity and near-duplicate selection risks.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names are overwhelmingly snake_case, but verb conventions are inconsistent (create/add/set/get/list/measure/compute/import/export/generate/render/apply), with direct aliases and a few single-word or noun-first tools (offset, shell, loft, draft_angle). Still generally readable, but not a predictable verb_noun pattern throughout.

    Tool Count1/5

    225 tools is an extreme mismatch for an MCP server, far beyond the 3-15 well-scoped range. The set is massively overgrown and likely overwhelming for agents to navigate.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface is broad across 2D/3D creation, annotation, dimensions, layers, blocks, constraints, assemblies, measurement, import/export, and geospatial workflows. However, core CAD editing gaps remain (e.g., no obvious move/rotate/scale for existing 2D entities), and many tools are explicitly simplified or stub-like.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues