Permanently delete a DSpace item by UUID, removing its bundles and bitstreams. Admin-only and irreversible.
Permanently delete an item from DSpace by UUID (admin only). This is irreversible: the item and its bundles/bitstreams are removed from the repository.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uuid | Yes | UUID of the item to delete |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden and does well: it declares the operation irreversible, discloses the cascade (bundles/bitstreams removed), and states the admin-only authorization requirement. It omits error/response behavior, but the destructive and auth semantics are covered.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, front-loaded with the action and identifier, followed immediately by the critical irreversibility warning. Every clause earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a destructive, single-parameter mutation tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description supplies the essential context: destructiveness, cascade scope, and auth requirement. Response/error behavior is unaddressed, but no output schema exists to defer to.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single 'uuid' parameter, so the schema already documents it; the description only restates 'by UUID'. Per the baseline rule for high coverage, a 3 is appropriate with no added syntax or format detail.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb ('Permanently delete'), resource ('an item from DSpace'), and identifier ('by UUID'), which cleanly distinguishes it from read/update siblings like dspace_get_item and dspace_update_item_metadata. An agent can identify the operation without opening the schema.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The '(admin only)' qualifier gives a clear precondition for use, effectively telling the agent when this tool is applicable. It does not name alternatives (e.g., 'use dspace_update_item_metadata to modify instead of delete') or state explicit when-not conditions, so it falls short of the top band.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.