DSpace MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to DSpace MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to operate DSpace repositories through a typed interface, including SAF package building, metadata editing, scientometric harvesting, open-access PDF downloads, and repository administration.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to work with cloud content storage through natural language, covering file and folder operations, uploads and downloads, search, collaborations, shared links, metadata templates, tasks, groups, and user management. Supports multiple authentication methods and STDIO, SSE, and HTTP transports.117MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that enables natural language querying of DSpace 7+ repositories via the REST API, allowing users to search, retrieve items, and analyze repository data.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceTurns hundreds of Alfresco MCP REST endpoints into a small set of tools for a local LLM, enabling natural language interaction with Alfresco while keeping everything local and secure.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to Obsidian vaults via the Local REST API to search notes, retrieve content, and perform semantic searches. It features self-healing multi-URL connectivity and supports both stdio and HTTP transports for flexible deployment.283 npm13MIT

Compoid MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search, download, create, and manage records and communities on Compoid repositories using natural language.42 PyPIMIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct target and action: auth tools (status/login/logout), hierarchy (list_communities, list_collections), retrieval (search, get_item), and mutation tools. The only potentially confusable pair — create_item vs create_workspace_item and update_item_metadata vs update_workspace_item — is explicitly disambiguated by the archived-vs-workspace distinction in the descriptions.
All 14 tools use a uniform snake_case convention with a consistent dspace_ prefix, and verbs (list/get/create/update/delete/upload/login/logout/search) are used predictably across resource nouns. No camelCase or mixed styles appear anywhere.
14 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each one maps to a distinct capability (auth lifecycle, hierarchy browsing, item CRUD, bitstream upload, workspace workflow). Nothing feels redundant or padded.
Item CRUD plus bitstream upload and a read side (communities/collections/search) are covered, but the workspace workflow is a dead end: create_workspace_item's own description says to 'submit for review' yet no submit tool exists, and delete_workspace_item, bitstream download, and community/collection management are absent. These gaps will force agents to abandon the documented deposit flow.