get_operator_archives

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It only describes the function (retrieving archives) without disclosing any behavioral traits such as read-only nature, authentication needs, or potential side effects. The description adds minimal behavioral context beyond the purpose.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence that is concise and includes a parenthetical example. Every word contributes to clarity with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has one parameter and an output schema (present but not detailed). The description sufficiently covers how to use the parameter. For a simple retrieval tool, it provides enough context for an AI agent to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter, 'operator_name', has 0% schema description coverage. The description adds significant meaning by specifying the format (Chinese in-game name) and providing an example ('阿米娅'), which is not present in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly specifies the verb '获取' (get) and resource '档案资料' (archives) for operators. Provides an example name '阿米娅' and indicates that the tool requires the in-game Chinese name, distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'get_operator_basic_info' and 'get_operator_voicelines'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs to use the in-game Chinese name (e.g., '阿米娅'), which informs correct usage. However, it does not mention when to avoid using this tool or suggest alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.