get_storage_status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

无注解覆盖行为特征，因此描述本身需传达行为信息。描述说明了返回 JSON 状态信息，但未说明是否需要特殊权限、是否只读、可能存在的副作用或错误行为。属于已知 schema 的只读型信息获取工具，缺失部分行为上下文。

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

描述仅两句话，高度简洁，信息密度适中，无冗余内容、无重复列出 schema 中已有的信息。

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

存在输出schema声明返回JSON格式并包含存储状态，对状态查询类工具足够完整。未说明权限、错误格式或故障条件等边界行为，缺少部分运维类工具的行为约束信息。

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

输入参数为0，schema覆盖率为100%。无参工具的参数语义由schema完全承载，描述未增加额外参数说明。

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

描述明确指出工具用于“获取存储配置和状态信息”，动词（获取）+资源（存储配置）+范围（本地/远程），语义清晰。但与同列工具 get_current_config、get_system_status 等存在边界模糊，未说明与这些工具的区别。

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

描述未提供任何使用时机、前置条件或与同族工具（get_current_config/get_system_status）的取舍说明。仅有隐含的用途暗示，未达‘清晰上下文但无排除说明’的4分水平。

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.