Skip to main content
Glama

sha512

Calculate SHA-512 hash values for text strings to verify data integrity and authenticate digital information using this cryptographic hashing function.

Instructions

Calculate SHA-512 hash of a string

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
inputYesThe input string to hash

Implementation Reference

  • MCP tool handler for 'sha512' that invokes DigestUtil.sha512 on the input and returns the hexadecimal hash as text content.
    ({ input }) => {
      const hash = DigestUtil.sha512(input);
      return {
        content: [{ type: "text", text: hash }],
      };
    }
  • Input schema for the sha512 tool using Zod: a single string parameter.
    {
      input: z.string().describe("The input string to hash"),
    },
  • Registration of the 'sha512' tool on the McpServer instance, including name, description, schema, and handler function.
    server.tool(
      "sha512",
      "Calculate SHA-512 hash of a string",
      {
        input: z.string().describe("The input string to hash"),
      },
      ({ input }) => {
        const hash = DigestUtil.sha512(input);
        return {
          content: [{ type: "text", text: hash }],
        };
      }
    );
  • Utility function DigestUtil.sha512 that computes the SHA-512 hash of the input string using CryptoJS and returns the hexadecimal string.
    static sha512(input: string): string {
      const hash = CryptoJS.SHA512(input);
      return hash.toString();
    }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the basic function without mentioning traits like performance, security implications, or output format. For a cryptographic tool with zero annotation coverage, this is a significant gap in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that is front-loaded with the core purpose. There is zero waste, making it appropriately sized and easy to understand without unnecessary elaboration.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity (single parameter, no annotations, no output schema), the description is minimally complete for its basic function. However, it lacks details on behavioral aspects and output, which could be important for a hash calculation tool. It meets the minimum viable threshold but has clear gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 100%, with the parameter 'input' fully documented in the schema. The description does not add any meaning beyond what the schema provides, such as details on input constraints or hash specifics. With high schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific verb ('Calculate') and resource ('SHA-512 hash of a string'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like md5, sha1, sha224, sha256, and sha384 by specifying the exact hash algorithm. It precisely communicates what the tool does without being vague or tautological.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by stating the tool's purpose, but it does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like other hash functions (e.g., md5, sha256) or encoding tools (e.g., base64_encode). No exclusions or specific contexts are mentioned, leaving usage decisions to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/1595901624/crypto-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server