Skip to main content
Glama
1595901624

Crypto_MCP

by 1595901624

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
aes_encryptC

encrypt text with aes

aes_decryptC

decrypt text with aes

md5A

Calculate MD5 hash of a string

sha1B

Calculate SHA-1 hash of a string

sha256B

Calculate SHA-256 hash of a string

sha384B

Calculate SHA-384 hash of a string

sha512B

Calculate SHA-512 hash of a string

sha224B

Calculate SHA-224 hash of a string

des_encryptC

encrypt text with des

des_decryptC

decrypt text with des

base64_encodeB

encode text to base64

base64_decodeC

decode base64 to text

hex_encodeA

encode text to hex

hex_decodeC

decode hex to text

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

C2.9/5.0

Scored across 14 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Each tool targets a distinct algorithm or operation, and the encrypt/decrypt and encode/decode pairs are clearly separated. The six hash tools are all described similarly and overlap in purpose, though the algorithm name (md5, sha256, etc.) provides enough distinction.

Naming Consistency3/5

Encryption/encoding tools follow an algorithm_verb pattern (aes_encrypt, base64_decode, hex_encode), but hash tools are bare algorithm names (sha256, md5, sha384) with no verb, creating inconsistent conventions. The style is readable but not uniformly patterned.

Tool Count4/5

14 tools is within a reasonable range for a cryptography utility server. The count is slightly padded by six SHA/MD5 hash variants that could arguably be one parameterized tool, but it is still a well-scoped collection.

Completeness3/5

The set covers symmetric encryption, common hashes, and encodings, but misses common crypto operations like HMAC, digital signatures, asymmetric encryption, and key generation. These are notable gaps for a server with the broad name Crypto_MCP, though the included core operations are solid.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues