Skip to main content
Glama

hex_decode

Convert hexadecimal encoded data back to readable text format. This tool decodes hex strings to their original text representation for data interpretation.

Instructions

decode hex to text

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contentYeshex to decode

Implementation Reference

  • The handler function for the 'hex_decode' tool. It receives the hex string in 'content', decodes it using HexUtil.hexToString, and returns the result as text content.
    async ({ content }: { content: string }) => {
        const result = HexUtil.hexToString(content);
        return {
            content: [
                {
                    type: "text",
                    text: result,
                },
            ],
        };
    }
  • The input schema for the 'hex_decode' tool, defining 'content' as a string (the hex to decode). Uses Zod for validation.
    {
        content: z.string().describe("hex to decode"),
    },
  • The registration of the 'hex_decode' tool on the MCP server, specifying name, description, input schema, and handler function.
    server.tool(
        "hex_decode",
        "decode hex to text",
        {
            content: z.string().describe("hex to decode"),
        },
        async ({ content }: { content: string }) => {
            const result = HexUtil.hexToString(content);
            return {
                content: [
                    {
                        type: "text",
                        text: result,
                    },
                ],
            };
        }
    );
  • The HexUtil.hexToString helper method that implements the core logic of decoding a hexadecimal string into the original text by parsing pairs of hex digits into character codes.
    static hexToString(hex: string): string {
        let str = '';
        for (let i = 0; i < hex.length; i += 2) {
            str += String.fromCharCode(parseInt(hex.substr(i, 2), 16));
        }
        return str;
    }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the basic action without mentioning error handling (e.g., invalid hex input), performance aspects, or any constraints like input size limits. This leaves significant gaps in understanding how the tool behaves beyond the core function.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with 'decode hex to text', a single phrase that directly conveys the purpose without any wasted words. It is front-loaded and efficient, making it easy for an agent to parse quickly, though it could benefit from more context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is minimal and lacks completeness. It does not explain return values, error cases, or usage context, which are important for an agent to invoke it correctly, especially with siblings that perform similar functions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with a clear description for the 'content' parameter as 'hex to decode', so the description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides. With high schema coverage, the baseline score is 3, as the description does not compensate with extra details but also does not detract.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'decode hex to text' clearly states the verb 'decode' and the resource 'hex', specifying the output as 'text', which distinguishes it from other encoding/decoding tools like base64_decode or hex_encode. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from all siblings, such as aes_decrypt, which also involves decoding but with encryption, making it slightly less specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like hex_encode or other decoding tools in the sibling list. It lacks explicit context, prerequisites, or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer usage based on the name alone, which is insufficient for clear decision-making.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/1595901624/crypto-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server