Skip to main content
Glama
0xhackerfren

Frida Game Hacking MCP

by 0xhackerfren

focus_window

Bring a specific game window to the foreground by title or handle for focused interaction during game hacking and reverse engineering tasks.

Instructions

Bring a window to the foreground.

Args:
    target: Window title (string) or HWND handle (integer)

Returns:
    Success status.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
targetYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Implementation Reference

  • The handler function implementing the 'focus_window' MCP tool. It locates the target window by title or handle and brings it to the foreground using Windows API (win32gui.SetForegroundWindow). Requires pywin32 for Windows support.
    @mcp.tool()
    def focus_window(target: Union[str, int]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """
        Bring a window to the foreground.
        
        Args:
            target: Window title (string) or HWND handle (integer)
        
        Returns:
            Success status.
        """
        if not SCREENSHOT_AVAILABLE:
            return {"error": "Window control not available. Install: pip install pywin32"}
        
        try:
            hwnd = None
            if isinstance(target, int):
                hwnd = target
            else:
                def find_window(h, _):
                    nonlocal hwnd
                    if win32gui.IsWindowVisible(h):
                        title = win32gui.GetWindowText(h)
                        if title and target.lower() in title.lower():
                            hwnd = h
                            return False
                    return True
                win32gui.EnumWindows(find_window, None)
            
            if not hwnd:
                return {"error": f"Window not found: {target}"}
            
            win32gui.SetForegroundWindow(hwnd)
            
            return {
                "success": True,
                "window": win32gui.GetWindowText(hwnd),
                "hwnd": hwnd
            }
        
        except Exception as e:
            return {"error": f"Failed to focus window: {str(e)}"}
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It states the action but doesn't disclose behavioral traits such as permissions needed (e.g., admin rights), side effects (e.g., focus stealing), error conditions (e.g., if window not found), or performance implications. The description is minimal and lacks critical operational details for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is highly concise and well-structured: a clear purpose statement followed by brief sections for args and returns. Every sentence earns its place with no redundant information, making it easy to parse and front-loaded with the core action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's moderate complexity (a mutation with one parameter) and no annotations, the description is partially complete. It covers the purpose and parameter semantics adequately, and the output schema exists (indicating a success status), so return values needn't be explained. However, it lacks behavioral details and usage guidelines, leaving gaps for safe and effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaningful context beyond the input schema, which has 0% coverage. It explains that 'target' can be a window title (string) or HWND handle (integer), clarifying the dual nature of the parameter. This compensates for the schema's lack of descriptions, though it doesn't detail format constraints (e.g., exact title matching).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Bring a window to the foreground') and specifies the resource (a window). It distinguishes from siblings like 'list_windows' or 'screenshot_window' by focusing on activation rather than listing or capturing. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from 'send_key_to_window' which also targets windows but for input purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention prerequisites (e.g., window must exist), exclusions (e.g., not for minimized windows), or compare to siblings like 'list_windows' for discovery or 'send_key_to_window' for interaction. Usage is implied by the action but lacks explicit context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/0xhackerfren/frida-game-hacking-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server