task_labels_remove
Remove a label from a task by providing the task ID and label ID.
Instructions
Remove a label from a task
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| taskId | Yes | The task ID | |
| labelId | Yes | The label ID to remove |
Remove a label from a task by providing the task ID and label ID.
Remove a label from a task
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| taskId | Yes | The task ID | |
| labelId | Yes | The label ID to remove |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits, but it only states the action. Missing details like idempotency, error handling (e.g., label not attached), or permission requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise, one sentence, front-loaded, with no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple two-parameter tool with no output schema, the description is adequate but minimal. Missing behavioral details like idempotency or return value, but given simplicity, it's sufficient.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with parameter descriptions (taskId, labelId). The description adds no extra meaning, so baseline score of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Remove a label from a task' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like task_labels_add (add label) and task_assignees_remove (remove assignee).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to remove a label vs. not removing it, or any prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/0xK3vin/vikunja-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server