task_comments_add
Add a comment to a task by providing the task ID and the comment text.
Instructions
Add a comment to a task
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| taskId | Yes | The task ID | |
| comment | Yes | The comment text |
Add a comment to a task by providing the task ID and the comment text.
Add a comment to a task
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| taskId | Yes | The task ID | |
| comment | Yes | The comment text |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Minimal disclosure; no details on write behavior, idempotency, permissions, or response. No annotations to supplement.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no waste. Efficient but could benefit from context in a second sentence.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Sufficient for a simple 2-param creation tool with no output schema, but lacks behavioral context like character limits or response handling.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters (taskId, comment). Description adds no additional meaning beyond schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description 'Add a comment to a task' clearly specifies action and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tool 'task_comments_list'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use, prerequisites, or alternatives. Agent is left without context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/0xK3vin/vikunja-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server