labels_delete
Delete a label by its ID. Provide the labelId parameter to remove the label from Vikunja.
Instructions
Delete a label
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| labelId | Yes | The label ID to delete |
Delete a label by its ID. Provide the labelId parameter to remove the label from Vikunja.
Delete a label
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| labelId | Yes | The label ID to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should disclose destructive nature or irreversibility, but it only states 'Delete a label' without any behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words, appropriately front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple delete with one parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate but could mention side effects or return value.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% for labelId with description, so the description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema; baseline of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a label' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like labels_create and labels_list.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/0xK3vin/vikunja-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server