get_hip4_l4_orderbook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds the Pro+ tier requirement and confirms the return content (full order-level book with user addresses), complementing annotations that already declare readOnly, safe, and idempotent behavior. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two succinct sentences front-loading the core purpose and return structure, with no redundancy. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema exists, the description sufficiently covers the tool's purpose, return content, and the Pro+ tier requirement. No gaps for a snapshot retrieval function.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed parameter descriptions. The description reinforces coin format but does not add significant new meaning beyond the schema. Adequate but not exceptional.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves a HIP-4 L4 orderbook reconstruction with specific details (order IDs, user addresses, prices, sizes), distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_hip4_orderbook or get_hip4_l4_orderbook_history.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It mentions 'Pro+ tier' as a prerequisite but does not explicitly guide on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., L2 orderbook, history tools). Usage context is implied through the description of the data returned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.