0xarchive-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to 0xarchive-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for the Hyperliquid / HyperEVM ecosystem - yields, protocol TVL, fees, markets, funding history, order-book depth.923 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for querying Hyperliquid perp markets, funding rates, order books, candles, and account positions/fills/funding for any address, without needing API keys or wallets.830 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides real-time data and insights from the Hyperliquid perp DEX for use in bots, dashboards, and analytics.1729MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server providing Hyperliquid perpetual futures market data including order books, prices, funding rates, open interest, volume, and OHLCV candles with pay-per-call micropayments via x402.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server implementation that integrates with Hyperliquid exchange, providing access to crypto market data including mid prices, historical candles, and L2 order books.317 npm44MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for Hyperliquid that provides public market data (prices, order books, funding) and any wallet's positions, orders, and fills via MCP tools, without requiring a private key.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 111 tools
The venue prefixes (hyperliquid, hip3, hip4, lighter, spot) make many tools distinguishable, but the L2/L4 orderbook family is genuinely confusing: get_orderbook vs get_l2_orderbook and get_orderbook_history vs get_l2_orderbook_history look near-identical apart from tier/depth details. HIP-4's current-vs-history naming also diverges enough to cause misselection.
The set follows a strong get_/web3_ + resource naming pattern, with venue prefixes applied consistently across most tool families. Minor inconsistencies like get_hip4_open_interest_current vs get_open_interest, and the ambiguous get_l2_orderbook vs get_orderbook, prevent a 5.
111 tools is an extreme tool count. Even though each endpoint is individually clear, exposing every venue, data type, tier, and historical variant as a separate tool creates an overwhelming selection surface and is well outside a coherent MCP tool scope.
For a data-archive server, the surface is impressively broad: current and historical trades, candles, funding, open interest, liquidations, order books, order flow, freshness, and SLA coverage across multiple venues. The main gaps are minor, such as no spot OHLCV candles and no HIP-4 candles, but price/trade history tools can partially cover those workflows.