queue_queue_peek

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the key behavioral trait that the item is returned without removal, which is crucial for a queue operation. However, no annotations are provided, and the description does not cover other behaviors like permissions, error conditions, or return value details beyond the output schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using a single sentence that includes a domain tag and the core functionality. Every word adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (1 param, no nested objects) and the presence of an output schema, the description is reasonably complete in terms of operation. However, it fails to document the parameter, which is a notable omission for a tool with only one parameter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one required parameter 'name' with 0% schema description coverage. The description does not mention this parameter or its purpose, failing to compensate for the lack of schema documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Return' and the resource 'next item', and explicitly notes 'WITHOUT removing it', which distinguishes it from sibling tools like queue_queue_pop. The '[queue]' prefix reinforces the domain.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use this tool (to peek without removal) but does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives. The sibling context provides differentiation, but the description lacks clear guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.