alert_alert_stats

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must cover behavioral traits. It does not state whether the tool is read-only, has side effects, requires authentication, or is rate-limited. Being a stats tool, it likely is safe, but the description does not confirm this.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: one sentence clearly stating purpose and return object. Structure is front-loaded with the tool's function and output.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present and no parameters, the description covers the core functionality. It names specific metrics (fire_count, last_fired) and return shape. Could mention how 'per rule' is determined, but overall sufficient for a tool without parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has zero parameters with 100% coverage. Description implicitly confirms no parameters are needed by focusing on the aggregation task. No additional param details are required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool aggregates stats per rule, listing fire_count and last_fired, and returns a structured object. It distinguishes itself from siblings like alert_alert_list and alert_alert_history by its aggregation purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as alert_alert_list or alert_alert_get. The description only states what it does without indicating contexts or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.