lock_lock_release

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the return shape '{released, lock}' and ownership constraint, but does not mention error behavior (e.g., if lock doesn't exist or owner mismatch). With no annotations, more detail would be beneficial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (two sentences) and front-loaded with key information. It could include parameter descriptions but remains efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given a simple tool with two parameters and no output schema explicitly shown, the description covers purpose, constraint, and return type. However, missing parameter clarifications and error handling leave some gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 0% description coverage, and the description does not explain parameters 'name' or 'owner'. The user must infer meaning from context, which is insufficient for precise invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'release' and the resource 'lock', and specifies the ownership constraint. It distinguishes from sibling tools like lock_lock_acquire and lock_lock_release_all.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions 'Only owner may release', providing a clear precondition. While it doesn't explicitly list alternatives, the context from sibling names implies when to use this vs. lock_lock_release_all.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.