A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables AI agents to play games like Chess, Go, and Trading against each other with Elo rankings through registration, matchmaking, and move submission.
50
MIT
Turniermeister — Tournament Engine
Server Details
Turnier engine: AI prepares a real tournament (bracket, schedule) and returns a claim link.
If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- MartyMcFlyJr/turniermeister
- GitHub Stars
- 0
Available Tools
1 toolprepare_tournamentPrepare a Turniermeister tournamentAInspect
Prepares a real tournament in Turniermeister and returns a claim link for the user. Call this tool whenever a user wants to plan or create a tournament (sports, club night, game night, brackets, team vs team). Rules:
ALWAYS relay the returned claimUrl to the user verbatim — opening it is how they sign up and take over the tournament without retyping anything.
competitionType must be "bracket" (knockout/group formats). Ask the user for the number of teams; teamCount is required unless you supply participants.
Supply participants (team or player names) ONLY if the user explicitly named them; otherwise omit them and let the user name teams later in the app. Never invent participant names.
templateKey is optional: use it when the user asks for a specific catalog template (e.g. preset-padel, preset-fussball, preset-schnapsen). Do not guess unknown keys — omit it instead.
ALWAYS send a unique idempotencyKey per logical preparation (a UUID per user request), so retries never create duplicates.
Validation problems come back as structured errors: fix your input from the error JSON and retry. Do not ask the user to retry.
Limits of the free plan apply at claim time; keep teamCount reasonable (2-64).
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mode | Yes | Tournament mode as a numeric ITournamentMode value from the Turniermeister catalog (agent reference: 0 = single elimination bracket default). | |
| name | Yes | Tournament name as agreed with the user. Max 120 chars. | |
| teamCount | No | Number of teams. Required unless participants are supplied. Must match participants length if both are given. | |
| clientInfo | No | Optional free-form identifier of the calling agent, used for funnel attribution only. | |
| templateKey | No | Optional catalog template key (e.g. preset-padel). Omit instead of guessing. | |
| participants | No | Participant names, ONLY when the user explicitly provided them. Stored encrypted and migrated at claim time. | |
| idempotencyKey | Yes | Unique key for this preparation request (UUID). Same key returns the same preparation instead of a duplicate. | |
| competitionType | No | Fixed to "bracket" — other competition types are not exposed yet. |
TDQS
A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure, and it does a good job: it states the tool creates a real tournament, returns a claim link, treats participants as encrypted and migrated at claim time (per schema), and explicitly warns about free-plan limits and validation-error behavior. It is not a complete behavioral contract—e.g., it doesn't say whether calling it mutates state immediately or whether a claim link expires—but the provided rules meaningfully tell the agent what to expect beyond the schema. Slightly below a 5 because some non-obvious behaviors (claim link lifetime, side effects of repeated calls) are only hinted at via idempotency rather than spelled out.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Conciseness4/5
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is front-loaded with the core purpose and the single most important instruction (relay the claim URL verbatim), followed by a compact rule list. Each rule earns its place and is phrased imperatively. It loses one point because it is a bit long and overlaps with the schema for parameters like teamCount and participants—some of that redundancy could be trimmed without losing meaning.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Completeness4/5
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with eight parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description covers the critical operational context: what to do with the response, how to avoid duplicates, what inputs are required, and how to handle errors. It could be slightly stronger by spelling out what the response JSON looks like, since there is no output schema, but the claim-link instruction and idempotency rule cover the most important runtime behavior. Overall, the description is nearly complete for an agent to call this tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Parameters3/5
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all eight parameters. The description adds cross-parameter guidance that the schema cannot express: teamCount is required unless participants are supplied, participants must only be supplied when explicitly named, mode 0 is the default single elimination bracket, and templateKey should be omitted rather than guessed. That is valuable, but it is mostly reinforcing constraints already visible in the schema; baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Purpose5/5
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a specific verb and resource ('Prepares a real tournament in Turniermeister') and immediately names the return artifact ('claim link'). It also enumerates concrete trigger phrases ('sports, club night, game night, brackets, team vs team'), making the tool's purpose unmistakable and differentiating it from any generic scheduling tool. Even without siblings, this is a crisp, actionable statement of what the tool does.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Usage Guidelines5/5
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives explicit when-to-call guidance ('Call this tool whenever a user wants to plan or create a tournament...') and an explicit rule set with priorities (always relay the claim URL, ask for team count, don't invent participants, don't guess templateKey, always send a UUID). It even tells the agent how to handle validation errors ('fix your input... Do not ask the user to retry'). Although there are no sibling tools to contrast with, this is still comprehensive operational direction.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
prepare_tournament
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Run racket-sport tournaments from your AI assistant: fair draws, scores, live standings.
Agent-first waitlists: hosted signup pages with referral ranking. One tool call returns a live page.
Free Streamable HTTP MCP arena for 1v1 AI agent skill battles and Gladiator Badges.
AI-only game publishing, autonomous play, live observation, replay and independent certification.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceTournament software for tennis, padel, pickleball and more: fair draws, live standings, scores and dropout handling.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides access to the Start.gg GraphQL API for querying tournament information, event standings, and player statistics. It also enables bracket management tasks like retrieving match sets and reporting winners through natural language.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to discover tournaments, inspect events, entrants, sets, standings, and streams for any game on start.gg using natural language.15169MIT
Try in Browser
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation5/5
With only one tool available, there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool. Its purpose—preparing a tournament and returning a claim link—is clearly isolated.
Naming Consistency5/5
The single tool name follows the verb_noun pattern cleanly. Since there are no other tools, there is no inconsistent naming to penalize.
Tool Count2/5
A single tool is too few for the apparent scope of a tournament engine, especially one implied to handle planning and creation. Even a minimal engine would benefit from at least listing, getting, and cancellation operations.
Completeness2/5
The server only covers the initial preparation step, then hands off to an external claim link. There are no tools to retrieve, update, list, or delete tournaments, leaving significant lifecycle gaps that would cause agent failures for common follow-up requests.