meta
Server Details
Validate Meta-ExternalAgent and Meta-WebIndexer IP addresses. Remote MCP validate_ip tool.
- Status
- Unhealthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Glama MCP Gateway
Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.
Full call logging
Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.
Tool access control
Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.
Managed credentials
Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.
Usage analytics
See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.
Tool Definition Quality
Average 3.4/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion or overlap with other tools.
The single tool name 'validate_ip' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which is consistent and predictable.
The single tool is appropriate for the very narrow domain of IP validation, but it feels minimal. A server dedicated to this specific task could benefit from additional related tools, but the current count is borderline.
The tool fully covers its stated purpose of validating whether an IP address is a genuine Meta-ExternalAgent IP. No additional operations are needed for this focused task.
Available Tools
1 toolvalidate_ipValidate Meta-ExternalAgent IPBInspect
Check whether an IP address (IPv4 or IPv6) is a genuine Meta-ExternalAgent IP address, verified against Meta-ExternalAgent's published IP data on seoapi.com.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ip | Yes | The IPv4 or IPv6 address to validate |
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions verification against an external source but does not disclose if the operation is read-only, idempotent, or if there are rate limits. The behavioral scope is partially clear but lacks full transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, focused sentence with no extraneous information. It directly states the core purpose and context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple validation tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description explains the input and the validation source. It lacks explicit mention of output format (e.g., boolean), but the tool's function is understandable without it.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (the single parameter 'ip' has a description in the schema). The description adds the context of verification against Meta-ExternalAgent's data, but the schema already communicates the parameter's purpose. No additional constraints or format details are provided.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool validates an IP address (IPv4 or IPv6) against Meta-ExternalAgent's published IP data. It specifies the verb 'validate' and the resource 'IP address', and distinguishes itself by naming the specific source, which is unique among siblings (none listed).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool, such as identifying incoming requests or verifying IP origins. No alternatives or exclusions are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Claim this connector by publishing a /.well-known/glama.json file on your server's domain with the following structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"maintainers": [{ "email": "your-email@example.com" }]
}The email address must match the email associated with your Glama account. Once published, Glama will automatically detect and verify the file within a few minutes.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEmail validation MCP server using MailboxValidator API to determine validity of an email address.3351MIT
- Alicense-qualityBmaintenanceProvides MCP tools for IP threat intelligence lookup and enrichment, including single IP lookup, bulk hunting, ASN expansion, and feed status queries.MIT
- Alicense-qualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing IP address lookup capabilities. Enables AI assistants to fetch details about public IP addresses or the user's current device IP.98ISC
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides access to the Netdetective API for querying information about IP addresses. It enables users to retrieve metadata for a specified IP address or the connecting client's default IP address.1MIT