Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Validate GPTBot and OAI-SearchBot IP addresses. Remote MCP validate_ip tool.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.1/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no risk of confusion between tools. The single tool has a clear and distinct purpose.

Naming Consistency5/5

The tool name 'validate_ip' follows a clear verb_noun pattern. With only one tool, naming consistency is perfect.

Tool Count2/5

For a server named 'openai', which suggests a broad set of OpenAI-related capabilities, having only one tool for IP validation feels insufficient and mismatched to the implied scope.

Completeness1/5

Given the server name 'openai', the surface is severely incomplete, lacking any tools for API interactions, model listings, or other core OpenAI functionalities.

Available Tools

1 tool
validate_ipValidate OpenAI GPTBot IPAInspect

Check whether an IP address (IPv4 or IPv6) is a genuine OpenAI GPTBot IP address, verified against OpenAI GPTBot's published IP data on seoapi.com.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ipYesThe IPv4 or IPv6 address to validate
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the verification source (OpenAI GPTBot's published IP data on seoapi.com), adding transparency beyond annotations. It does not mention side effects or rate limits, but for a read-only check, this is sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no waste. It is appropriately front-loaded and every word contributes to the purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description fully covers the purpose and verification source, leaving no gaps in understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers 100% of parameters with a description of the 'ip' parameter as 'The IPv4 or IPv6 address to validate'. The description repeats this, adding no new semantic value, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the tool checks if an IP address (IPv4 or IPv6) is a genuine OpenAI GPTBot IP, verified against published data. This is a specific verb-resource combination and distinguishes it from any potential related tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you need to validate an IP against GPTBot data, but it does not provide explicit guidance on when to use alternatives or exclude cases. For a simple validation tool, this is adequate but not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources