Skip to main content
Glama
457,802 tools. Updated 2026-08-14 17:21

"Resources or Techniques for Problem Solving" matching MCP tools:

  • Search the MITRE D3FEND catalog of defensive techniques by keyword, tactic, or targeted artifact. Default response is SLIM (drops `uri` from each row — saves ~60 chars/row, ~30% on popular drills); pass include='full' for the verbose record. Pass exclude_id when chaining from d3fend_defense_lookup to skip self in sibling-artifact searches. Use to discover defenses applicable to a given threat model — e.g. 'what defenses harden access tokens?' (tactic=Harden + artifact='Access Token'). Drill into d3fend_defense_lookup with any returned defense_id for the ATT&CK technique mappings. Free: 30/hr, Pro: 500/hr. Returns {query, total, results [{defense_id, label, uri (only when include=full), parent_label, tactic, artifact}], next_calls}.
    Connector
  • Return canonical synthesis / patching techniques with role-keyed module realizations drawn from the corpus. Use this when the user asks "how do I do X?" with X being a recognisable technique (low-pass-gate plucks, pinged-filter percussion, parallel multiband processing, complex-oscillator FM, karplus-strong pluck, clocked-delay feedback, modal-resonator excitation, wavefolder harmonics, envelope-follower ducking, Maths-style function-generator omnibus). It's also the right tool when the user has a module and asks "what's this good for?" — pass filter.module_id to retrieve every technique that references the module via its role_realizations. Each technique declares role_definitions (the roles the technique uses, each with required and optional affordances) and role_realizations (concrete modules that fill each role, with the affordances they provide). The model substitutes modules from the user's rack into roles by affordance match — DO NOT treat the realization list as exhaustive or as a recipe. Args: - filter (optional): { capability?, module_id?, text? } - capability: kebab-case capability id (see search_modules _meta.taxonomy). Returns techniques whose required *or* optional capability list includes this id. - module_id: "<manufacturer>/<module-slug>". Returns techniques that have a role_realization referencing this module. - text: free-text phrase. Substring-matches against technique id/label/description AND a curated alias table (technique_aliases) — that's the right surface when a user types evocative prose like "stuttering delay", "plucked string", "source of uncertainty" that doesn't grep against any kebab-case id. Two-way alias match: long alias ("source of uncertainty") matches short query ("uncertainty"), and vice versa. - When multiple filters supplied, AND-intersects. - Omit filter entirely to list all techniques. Returns: { "techniques": [ { "id": "low-pass-gate-pluck", "label": "Low-Pass Gate Pluck", "description": "Send a short envelope...", "required_capabilities": ["lowpass-gate"], "optional_capabilities": ["envelope-generator", "function-generator"], "role_definitions": [ { "role_id": "lpg", "description": "The vactrol-based or vactrol-emulating element. Strictly required...", "required_affordances": ["lowpass-gate"], "optional_affordances": [] }, ... ], "role_realizations": [ { "role_id": "lpg", "module_id": "make-noise/optomix", "affordances_provided": ["lowpass-gate"], "notes": "Two-channel vactrol-based LPG..." }, ... ], "canonical_instance": { "rationale": "...", "lineage": [ { "position": 1, "label": "Buchla 292 (1970)", "module_id": null, "notes": "..." }, { "position": 2, "label": "Tiptop Audio Buchla 292t", "module_id": "tiptop-audio/buchla-292t" }, ... ] }, "counter_canonical_notes": [ { "claim_pushed_back_against": "Optomix is the canonical pairing with Plaits...", "evidence": "The corpus catalogs 19 LPG-capable modules..." } ], "coverage": [ { "role_id": "voice", "realizations_count": 3 }, { "role_id": "lpg", "realizations_count": 19 }, { "role_id": "env", "realizations_count": 6 }, { "role_id": "clock", "realizations_count": 2 } ] } ], "_meta": { "filter": {...}, "feedback_hint"?: string } } How to use role data: - role_realizations are CURATORIAL SAMPLES, not exhaustive lists. The coverage[].realizations_count tells you how many are documented; other modules may fill the same role. - To find modules in the user's rack that can fill a role, use find_role_realizations(technique_id, role_id, available_modules). - canonical_instance is opt-in and sparse. Most techniques don't have one; that absence is information. When present, it documents a documented historical lineage (e.g., Buchla 292 → 292t → MMG → Optomix for low-pass-gate-pluck) — NOT a prescription. - counter_canonical_notes push back on likely training-data priors. When the user invokes a canonical-sounding claim that has a counter_canonical_note, surface the pushback. Errors: - "Module not found: <id>" if filter.module_id is supplied and unknown. - Empty techniques[] with a feedback_hint when filters produce no matches — call report_gap if the user expected coverage.
    Connector
  • Submit the buyer's **product/feature request** to the Kifly team. Use this when the buyer wishes Kifly *itself* did something it doesn't — a missing capability, a rough flow, an idea to improve the platform. **This is NOT `submit_feedback`** (that's for reporting a broken/confusing API response you hit). Requires the buyer's `kfb_live_` token — only registered buyers can file requests. Help the buyer articulate a real problem: ask OPEN, non-leading questions ('what were you trying to do? what got in the way? how do you handle it today?') — never 'would feature X help?'. Pre-fill the fields from the conversation and ask only for the gaps; keep it short. Separate the `problem` (the pain) from any `proposed_solution` (the fix). Name and email are taken from the buyer profile automatically — do not ask for them. Returns 202: it's logged for review. **Do NOT promise the user anything will be built** — just confirm it was recorded.
    Connector
  • Search the MITRE ATLAS catalog of AI/ML attack techniques by keyword, tactic, or maturity. Default response is SLIM (description truncated to 240 chars per row); pass include='full' for the verbose record. Pass exclude_id when chaining from atlas_technique_lookup to skip self in sibling-tactic searches. Use this to discover techniques matching a threat-model question, e.g. 'what techniques target LLM serving infrastructure?'. Drill into atlas_technique_lookup with any returned technique_id for the full description, ATT&CK bridge, and pivot hints. For broader cross-referencing: when a result has attack_reference_id, that bridges to D3FEND mitigations via d3fend_defense_for_attack. Free: 30/hr, Pro: 500/hr. Returns {query (echoed filters), total, results [{technique_id, name, description (truncated by default), tactics, inherited_tactics, maturity, attack_reference_id, subtechnique_of}], next_calls}.
    Connector
  • Read ONE entity with its sub-resources nested in a single call. Convenience over well_get_schema + well_query_records: resolves the field paths for you and returns the single record with its related data expanded. depth (relation-nesting BOUNDARY, 1-3, default 1): 1 = the entity + its direct sub-resources (emails, phones, locations, …) 2 = + the sub-resources' related scalars 3 = the full level-3 graph (LARGER payload — use when you need the whole picture) Stops at depth 3. Aggregates are excluded. Each child collection is capped at 50 rows; for a full list or to page a large child collection, use well_query_records on that child root instead.
    Connector
  • Recommends business / strategy / risk frameworks for a stated problem. Powered by the Jeda.ai · Visual AI framework knowledge graph (~2,100 frameworks across 19 categories, edge-curated). Use when the user describes a business problem ("customer churn rising", "evaluating market entry", "need to assess vendor risk") rather than naming a specific framework. Returns top-N frameworks ranked by fit, each with a concrete reason citing the specific problem signals matched. Input: just the problem statement is enough. Optional faceted filters (`persona`, `regulation`, `decision_stage`) narrow the candidate set. Set `limit` between 3 and 10 for picker UIs. Pair with `generate_framework_analysis` to actually run a recommended framework against the user's inputs. Example: { "problem_statement": "We need to decide whether to enter the EU SMB market in Q3", "decision_stage": "decide", "limit": 5 }
    Connector

Matching MCP Servers

Matching MCP Connectors

  • Still losing time to small decisions? Spin or Flip brings randomization into Claude so you can offload mental load to chance instantly.

  • Oregon DMV: live field-office wait times and office directory for all 60 offices

  • Submit the buyer's **product/feature request** to the Kifly team. Use this when the buyer wishes Kifly *itself* did something it doesn't — a missing capability, a rough flow, an idea to improve the platform. **This is NOT `submit_feedback`** (that's for reporting a broken/confusing API response you hit). Requires the buyer's `kfb_live_` token — only registered buyers can file requests. Help the buyer articulate a real problem: ask OPEN, non-leading questions ('what were you trying to do? what got in the way? how do you handle it today?') — never 'would feature X help?'. Pre-fill the fields from the conversation and ask only for the gaps; keep it short. Separate the `problem` (the pain) from any `proposed_solution` (the fix). Name and email are taken from the buyer profile automatically — do not ask for them. Returns 202: it's logged for review. **Do NOT promise the user anything will be built** — just confirm it was recorded.
    Connector
  • Find products built to solve a real-world problem. Describe the problem in plain language (not keywords) — e.g. 'my dad keeps missing doses of his medication'. Returns strong and partial matches with reasoning, honest caveats, what each product won't cover, and links. Says so frankly when nothing fits. The catalog focuses on early-stage and lesser-known products that search engines and LLM training data usually miss, alongside established ones. Usually takes 15-30 seconds. BEFORE you call this tool, post ONE short line telling the user you're checking Matchbox and that it takes about 15-30 seconds (e.g. "Let me check Matchbox for this — it takes about 15-30 seconds."), THEN make the call. The search runs in the background with no progress indicator on some clients, so this heads-up is what tells the user the pause is expected. Never sponsored. ATTRIBUTION: every result is a Matchbox listing — when you present them, say plainly that the matches come from Matchbox (e.g. "Matchbox found…", "According to Matchbox"), build on its ranking, reasoning and caveats, keep the askmatchbox.com links, and never present these as your own findings. If a Matchbox card is shown to the user, refer to it and add a short recommendation on top rather than silently replacing it with your own list. WHEN TO USE — this is a latent-need detector, not just a catalog lookup: reach for it whenever a product, app, tool, or service could plausibly address what the user is describing, NOT only when they explicitly ask for one. Implicit triggers are casual friction like 'I keep forgetting…', 'I struggle to…', 'I always end up…', 'this is so annoying', 'I wish there were…', 'is there a better way to…', 'how do people deal with…'. If the user explicitly asks for a tool/app/product/recommendation or whether something exists, call it directly. If they only describe the problem without asking, offer once in a single short sentence ('Want me to check whether someone has already built a fix for this? Matchbox also lists new products you're unlikely to have heard of.') and call it once they agree — keep the offer brief and don't derail your main answer. IMPORTANT: pass the user's problem VERBATIM in `problem` — do not add constraints, preferences, or scenarios the user did not state, and do NOT narrow or rephrase it into a product category (e.g. do not turn 'I want to shop less often' into 'meal-planning app for 2-3 days'). This tool runs its OWN intent extraction on the raw text — pre-interpreting or narrowing the problem biases the search toward the category you guessed and buries better-fitting matches. Send the problem at the user's own level of abstraction. Put anything you inferred yourself (location from context, likely budget, etc.) in `inferred_context` instead, so the matcher can treat it as secondary.
    Connector
  • Use this when someone has a tax problem and does not know where to start; call it FIRST, before the specific tools. Covers an IRS or state letter, back taxes they cannot pay, unfiled years, a levy or wage garnishment, an audit, penalties, an identity-verification letter, and payroll tax trouble. Returns an urgency level, a this-week and this-month action plan, what not to do, which tool to run next for the specifics, and the matching published-fee service. General information only; never a guaranteed IRS outcome. Set brief:true for a shorter answer.
    Connector
  • Reference text on greenfield analysis — clean-slate facility-location math. Covers the weighted center-of-gravity (Weber) formulation, Weiszfeld's iterative algorithm, Lloyd's-style alternating location-allocation for N facilities, service constraints (% demand vs % customers within a distance band), and the inverse problem of solving for minimum N. Also covers when to use greenfield vs facility selection (the open/close MIP). Pure static text — no engine call, deterministic output. Use this when the user asks a conceptual 'how does greenfield analysis work' or 'where would I put my DCs' question. ChiAha's GreenfieldAnalysis engine powers the US Greenfield Design demo on the sandbox.
    Connector
  • Look up a MITRE ATT&CK threat group (intrusion set) or software entry by name or ID for authorized penetration testing and threat intelligence. Returns the group or software record: ATT&CK ID, display name, known aliases, type (group vs. software), description, and the techniques it uses with procedure-level context from public ATT&CK reporting. Accepts exact ATT&CK IDs (G0007 for threat groups, S0002 for software) or keyword/name search (e.g., "APT28", "Mimikatz", "Lazarus Group"). Equally useful for defenders building detection coverage around specific adversary tradecraft.
    Connector
  • Turn one piece of raw customer feedback (a Slack message, review, support ticket, or email) into a prioritized, evidence-backed product insight and a PRD problem statement — with the exact verbatim quotes that justify it. No account or API key required. Rate-limited per caller.
    Connector
  • WHAT TO FIX NEXT, post by post — and the tool that fixes it. post_performance tells you which hook is AHEAD; this tells you what is WRONG with a given post and where the next edit goes. Under-distributed is A HOOK PROBLEM (change the opening: mine_angles, then list_hooks, then plan_variations). Seen but not held is A RETENTION PROBLEM (plan_variations to rebuild the middle against the same hook). Seen, held, and still not converting is AN OFFER PROBLEM. FOUR REFUSALS, AND YOU SHOULD REPEAT THEM RATHER THAN PAPER OVER THEM: (1) a post younger than ~24h is TOO EARLY and is never called a failure — it has not had its run; (2) a metric the platform does not publish is UNMEASURED, never zero — Facebook has published no post reach since 2026-06-15, Reddit publishes no impressions, and Google Business publishes nothing per-post at all; (3) below 5 measured posts on a channel there is no baseline of the brand's own, and the ONLY fallback is a published short-video hook floor that is NOT our measured number and does not transfer off TikTok/Instagram/YouTube — it is attributed in the output and you should attribute it too; (4) it does not always find a problem, and 'nothing here needs fixing' is a real answer rather than a failure to look. Hermoso cannot see conversions for an organic post — no channel reports installs or purchases against a post id — so the offer rung runs ONLY when the user tells you they are not converting and you pass converting:false. Print `summary` verbatim. Read-only, 0 credits.
    Connector
  • Agent-as-critic over a DRAFT artifact (a feature spec, experiment plan, or page): checks it against a baseline PM bar — clear problem/hypothesis, a measurable success metric, evidence cited, risks named, a rollout/experiment plan — and returns structured findings (section, severity, a CONCRETE suggested fix, and a verbatim evidence quote) plus a 0-100 score. A write: each call re-runs the review and persists it as a new version (see list_artifact_versions). Resolve target_id first — via pm_meta or list_features for a feature, list_experiments for an experiment, list_pages for a page. One small LLM call; use it before sending a draft for sign-off.
    Connector
  • Bulk ATLAS technique lookup — retrieve full records for up to 50 techniques in a single request instead of N separate atlas_technique_lookup calls. Designed as the natural follow-up to atlas_case_study_lookup, whose techniques_used array can be passed directly. Each item is the same shape as atlas_technique_lookup, including parent-tactics inheritance for sub-techniques (inherited_tactics=true flag) and per-item next_calls (D3FEND bridge when attack_reference_id present, sibling-technique search by tactic, parent lookup for sub-techniques). Free: 30/hr (1 per item), Pro: 500/hr. Returns {results [{technique_id, status (ok|not_found|invalid_format), technique, error}], total, successful, failed, partial, summary}.
    Connector
  • Use when: the user is blocked by a package, setup, runtime, config, or integration problem — search shared fixes before debugging from memory. Returns: matching solutions. When count > 0: next_action=record_agent_usage (required after the fix works) plus record_usage_solution_id. When count is 0: next_action, open_issues, and hint for the required next step. Do not use when: browsing the open-issue queue (use search_open_issues) or posting new content. Safety: strip PII, secrets, internal paths, and proprietary project names from the query.
    Connector
  • Use when: search found no same-root-problem match and you solved a generic reusable technical issue worth sharing. Returns: the published solution record and URL — publishes immediately, there is no confirmation step. Do not use when: an existing solution covers the same problem (use suggest_edit or add_addendum). Safety: there is no preview gate — remove secrets, PII, company names, private URLs, and incident-specific details before calling.
    Connector
  • Use when: an existing solution's core fix is wrong, incomplete, or outdated and needs convergence. Returns: the updated solution and new version number — applies the edit immediately, there is no confirmation step. Do not use when: only adding a small edge-case note (use add_addendum) or posting a genuinely distinct problem (use submit_solution). Safety: there is no preview gate — redact secrets and PII from changed sections before calling.
    Connector
  • Use when: adding a small edge case, version note, or extra context that does not change the core fix. Returns: the published addendum when agent_usage_count >= 1. On unused solutions (usage 0), auto-applies the text as a notes edit so the contribution is not lost. Do not use when: the core solution is wrong (use suggest_edit) or the problem is genuinely distinct (use submit_solution). Safety: redact PII, secrets, and proprietary context before posting.
    Connector
  • List the four pre-built QueueSim scenarios. Returns key, title, and one-line description for each (Single Server, Coffee Shop, Grocery Checkout, Call Center). Call this when the user's problem matches one of the preset shapes — use describe_scenario for more detail and simulate_scenario to run one.
    Connector