Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Still losing time to small decisions? Spin or Flip brings randomization into Claude so you can offload mental load to chance instantly.

Ownership verified
Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Available Tools

1 tool
spinorflipAInspect

Send a decision wheel to Spin or Flip and get a shareable spinning-wheel URL. Use this whenever a user wants to spin a wheel or make a random decision. Before calling this tool, generate the wheel yourself: pick a short title (2–6 words) and 6–12 options (1–4 words each) based on the topic. Optionally include a CSS linear-gradient background that matches the mood of the topic. Returns a URL the user can open to spin the wheel instantly.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
titleYesShort wheel title, 2–6 words (e.g. "Best Pizza Styles", "Weekend Activities")
optionsYes6–12 options, 1–4 words each (e.g. ["Margherita", "Pepperoni", "BBQ Chicken"])
gradientNoOptional CSS linear-gradient matching the topic mood (e.g. "linear-gradient(135deg, #f97316 0%, #ef4444 100%)")

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the return format (a shareable URL) and requires the caller to generate wheel content beforehand, but does not mention potential errors, rate limits, or data handling, which are relevant for an external service call.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, every sentence earns its place: what it does, when to use it, and how to prepare inputs. The most important information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with 100% schema coverage and no output schema, the description adequately explains the return value and procedural steps. It could mention error scenarios or validation behavior, but the current level suffices for straightforward use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the description largely restates the same constraints (title 2–6 words, options 6–12 items, 1–4 words each). It adds minor guidance about matching the topic mood, but does not substantially deepen understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb+resource ('Send a decision wheel to Spin or Flip') and immediately states the output ('get a shareable spinning-wheel URL'). It clearly distinguishes this tool's purpose from any generic random-decision tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use the tool ('Use this whenever a user wants to spin a wheel or make a random decision') and provides concrete pre-call instructions on generating the title, options, and optional gradient. No alternatives exist among siblings, so no exclusions are needed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables detection and analysis of pre-public product launches through web search, content extraction, AI-powered scoring, and automated alerting. Provides comprehensive tools for surfacing stealth startup signals before they trend publicly.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Browse IndustryLens's published competitive-intelligence reports and head-to-head competitor comparisons from any AI agent — real, source-backed data.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI chat clients to perform market research and competitive intelligence by gathering company overviews, competitor lists, product portfolios, pricing snapshots, and recent news via live Tavily search.
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no risk of confusion between tools. The single tool's purpose is clearly defined.

Naming Consistency4/5

With only one tool, naming consistency is not a concern. The name 'spinorflip' is descriptive but does not follow a verb_noun pattern, though it is not inconsistent.

Tool Count3/5

A single tool for generating a spinning wheel is borderline thin but fits the narrow purpose. The server would benefit from additional tools for related actions (e.g., history, customization), but it remains functional.

Completeness5/5

The single tool fully covers the server's declared purpose: generating a shareable spinning wheel with user-provided title, options, and optional background. No obvious gaps exist for this domain.

Resources