Skip to main content
Glama
zzszzs-lll

Vivado Agent MCP

by zzszzs-lll
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Vivado Agent MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Vivado Agent MCP

      QianQianlin2031
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to safely automate Vivado build flows through state-aware MCP tools, asynchronous job tracking, and readiness gates for synthesis, implementation, and bitstream generation.
      10
      MIT

    • pango-mcp

      Renkos1
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable agents to drive a real FPGA toolchain end to end—simulating, asserting, synthesizing, scanning JTAG, capturing on-chip waveforms, and configuring real silicon behind confirmation gates.
      2
      45
      Apache 2.0

    • Vivado MCP Native

      Arthurzxy
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to directly launch, control, and analyze AMD/Xilinx Vivado on Windows and Linux, supporting project management, synthesis, implementation, bitstream generation, timing/resource analysis, and simulation through a persistent Tcl session.
      45 PyPI
      MIT

    • MCP for Vivado

      lzw12123
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An AI-centric MCP server that enables automated Xilinx Vivado workflows, including project management, synthesis, implementation, and timing analysis. It allows AI agents to drive hardware design processes while integrating directly with the official Vivado GUI for visual context.
      15
      4
      -

    • mcp-verilog

      zesun33
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and IDEs to lint, compile, syntax-check, and simulate Verilog/SystemVerilog designs through structured, token-efficient MCP tools with isolated containerized toolchains.
      4
      32 npm
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 41 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources and actions: project lifecycle, simulation, synthesis, timing, constraints, and artifact collection are cleanly separated. A few diagnostic aggregation tools like run_project_audit, collect_diagnostic_bundle, and run_pre_hw_signoff have overlapping purposes, but their descriptions delineate different scopes and outputs. Overall, an agent can generally tell the tools apart with only minor risk of misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: get_, create_, run_, check_, collect_, validate_, etc. Even the agent-facing meta tools like get_agent_workflows and get_workflow_trace_status conform to the same convention. No camelCase or mixed verb styles are present.

    Tool Count2/5

    41 tools is well above the 25+ threshold for a heavy tool surface. While the Vivado Project Mode flow is broad, many diagnostic aggregation and artifact collection tools could be consolidated into fewer multi-purpose tools. This count will likely overwhelm agents and increase selection latency.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides coverage across the entire Project Mode PL development lifecycle: project creation/opening, simulation, synthesis, implementation, bitstream generation, timing/constraint analysis, diagnostic bundles, and pre-hardware signoff. The surface is remarkably complete for the stated 'no-board Project Mode PL development' scope, with no critical dead ends for standard workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources