set_alert_definition_state

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=false, openWorldHint=true. The description adds '[WRITE]' and explains the state change but does not disclose potential side effects beyond enabling/disabling, which is adequate for a simple toggle. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a clear structure: a one-line summary followed by an Args section. Every sentence provides necessary information without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is complete for a simple mutation tool, explaining parameters and referencing list_alert_definitions. However, it does not describe the return value or confirmation of success, which is a minor gap given no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description compensates by explaining definition_id as coming from list_alert_definitions, enabled as boolean toggling, and target as optional with default behavior. This adds meaningful context beyond schema titles.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description starts with '[WRITE]' indicating a write operation and clearly states 'Enable or disable an existing alert definition.' This specifies the verb (enable/disable) and resource (alert definition), distinguishing it from siblings like create_alert_definition or delete_alert_definition.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by mentioning that definition_id comes from list_alert_definitions and explains the enabled and target parameters. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., create_alert_definition) or provide when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.