Skip to main content
Glama
zql78

mcp-linux-ops

by zql78

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-linux-ops

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with shell execution and file management capabilities on a development VM, including running commands and editing files via tools like run_command, read_file, and edit_file.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with the ability to control Linux desktop environments through tools for file management, application launching, and system operations like clipboard access. It includes a multi-level security model to manage permissions for safe, elevated, and restricted actions.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to execute CLI commands and scripts for system deployment and management tasks, with support for directory listing, system info, and deployment templates.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables an LLM agent to search files, list directories, read and write UTF-8 text files, move or delete paths, list terminal processes, and launch a terminal in a chosen folder.
      8
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to securely control remote Linux servers via SSH for command execution, file operations, and system monitoring, plus browser automation capabilities for web navigation, form interaction, and screenshot capture.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct action (execute, read, write, list, create, delete, check, info, copy, move), with no overlap. Even though file and directory operations are combined in some tools, descriptions clarify that they handle both, eliminating ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., read_file, create_directory, copy_file). The only exception is file_exists, which uses noun_verb, creating a minor inconsistency that prevents a perfect score.

    Tool Count5/5

    10 tools is well within the ideal range for a Linux file operations server. Each tool covers a distinct operation with no redundancy, and the count feels appropriately scoped for the purpose.

    Completeness5/5

    The server covers the full lifecycle for files and directories: create, read, write, delete, list, copy, move, check existence, and get info, plus arbitrary command execution. This is a complete surface for the stated domain, with no obvious dead ends or missing critical operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues