Skip to main content
Glama
tender-radar-mcp

tender-radar-mcp

by zohaibaamer

Related Servers

Alternatives to tender-radar-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to find, score, and monitor government contract opportunities across UK, EU, and US with AI-powered relevance scoring.
      2
      103 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and retrieve public procurement notices from 17 sources across Germany, the EU, and the UK, with filtering by country, CPV code, deadline, and contract value, plus full tender details and source freshness checks.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      UK public procurement data for AI agents. Tenders, contracts, buyer and supplier profiles over MCP and REST. 250 free credits.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching and analyzing government tenders, contract awards, and pre-tender pipelines from 21 official sources, with tools for tender search, award intelligence, and detailed notice retrieval.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes a governed dbt MetricFlow semantic layer to AI agents through three tools — list metrics, list dimensions and query metrics — so questions about federal contract spend are answered from defined metrics rather than raw tables. Guardrails reject undefined metrics, raw columns, SQL in filters and bulk exports, and no tool can execute SQL.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinguishable role: keyword search, ref-based detail, profile ranking, profile listing, deadline windows, and governed aggregation. The only mild overlap is that search_tenders, match_profile, and upcoming_deadlines all return tender lists, but the descriptions make the distinguishing dimension (keywords vs. profile fit vs. deadline horizon) clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Five of six names follow a clean verb_noun pattern (search_tenders, get_tender, match_profile, list_company_profiles, query_metric). upcoming_deadlines breaks the pattern as a bare noun phrase, a minor but noticeable deviation.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a tender discovery service: discovery, detail, profiling, and aggregation each get one entry point. No redundant or filler tools are present.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core read-only lifecycle: find tenders, inspect one in full with cross-portal links, rank by profile, track deadlines, and aggregate via a governed metric. Minor gaps exist around exporting/saving results or listing available sources, but these are workarounds rather than dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessOutdated data