Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to GDB MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with GDB for debugging via the MCP protocol. Supports setting breakpoints, stepping through code, inspecting memory and registers, and more.
      85
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM clients to interact with the GNU Debugger (GDB) for comprehensive debugging and binary analysis. It provides a wide range of tools for program execution control, memory examination, stack analysis, and disassembly.
      13
      72
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to debug ARM Cortex-M targets via GDB and OpenOCD, supporting attach, breakpoints, stepping, register/memory inspection, and SVD peripheral decoding.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables GDB debugging for embedded development workflows, allowing users to start sessions, load programs, set breakpoints, step through code, and examine memory/registers/variables via natural language.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control GDB debugger via MCP protocol for local and remote debugging, supporting CTF Pwn, crash analysis, and ELF inspection.
      13
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 31 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clear distinct purposes, but some overlap exists between gdb_run/gdb_continue and gdb_next/gdb_step. The descriptions help differentiate, but an agent might still confuse similar actions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'gdb_verb_noun' pattern in snake_case, making the naming predictable and easy to interpret for both agents and humans.

    Tool Count2/5

    31 tools is high for typical MCP server coherence; while GDB debugging is complex, the count exceeds the 25-tool threshold for 'too many' and could be streamlined (e.g., combining some list operations).

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers most core GDB workflows (breakpoints, stepping, memory, registers, expressions, threads). Minor gaps like watchpoints or variable modification exist, but overall it's comprehensive.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues