session_exec
Executes a command in an existing tmux session on a remote VPS, enabling persistent command management.
Instructions
向已有会话发送命令
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| command | Yes | ||
| sessionId | Yes |
Executes a command in an existing tmux session on a remote VPS, enabling persistent command management.
向已有会话发送命令
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| command | Yes | ||
| sessionId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'send command', omitting effects like execution context, error behavior, or potential side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words. Front-loaded with key action, but lacks detail which could be added without harming conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with two required parameters and no output schema, the description omits essential context like prerequisites, return values, or failure modes. Incomplete for task selection.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Parameter names (command, sessionId) are somewhat self-explanatory, but the description provides no additional meaning, leaving 0% schema coverage unaddressed. No explanation of format or constraints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool sends a command to an existing session, with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like session_read (read only) and run_command (likely standalone command execution).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like run_command or session_start. Does not mention prerequisites such as session must be active.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zhy1369800/vps-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server