get_system_status
Get a system status summary or process list from your VPS. Sort processes by CPU or memory usage.
Instructions
获取 VPS 系统状态或进程列表
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sort | No | 进程排序方式 | |
| type | No | summary: 系统概览, processes: 进程列表 |
Get a system status summary or process list from your VPS. Sort processes by CPU or memory usage.
获取 VPS 系统状态或进程列表
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sort | No | 进程排序方式 | |
| type | No | summary: 系统概览, processes: 进程列表 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, description carries full burden but only states purpose, not behavioral traits like safety, side effects, or required permissions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise, but it is in Chinese while tool name and schema are in English, potentially causing language mismatch.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with two optional params and no output schema; description covers basic purpose but lacks details on return format or pagination.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description adds 'VPS' context but does not enhance meaning beyond schema descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Get VPS system status or process list' using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like run_command or session_read.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No exclusions or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zhy1369800/vps-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server