indexing_batch_submit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses the batch submission behavior and daily quotas, but lacks details on error handling, default engine behavior, or partial success outcomes. Since annotations are absent, more context would be beneficial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise with one sentence delivering key information. Front-loaded with action and limits. Could add more context without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Minimally complete for a batch submission tool. Includes quota limits and mentions both engines. Lacks return value description and error handling, which would be helpful given no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description doesn't need to explain parameters much. It adds value by mentioning quotas, but does not clarify parameter formats or defaults beyond what schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Submit multiple URLs for indexing in batch.' It uses a specific verb and resource, and the 'batch' distinguishes it from the single-submit sibling tool indexing_submit_url.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides quota limits for Google and Bing, which helps with when to use the tool. However, no explicit guidance on when not to use it or alternatives beyond the quota mention.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.